From: Hansang Bae (hbae@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Mar 12 2002 - 00:38:28 GMT-3
At 11:06 AM 3/11/2002 +0000, Carl Phelan wrote:
>Probably a very basic question - excuse my ignorance! When you place
>sc0 in a VLAN on a Cat 5000 which is attached to one router e.g.
>Cat 5k.
>Set int sc0 20 ip add 160.1.1.20 255.255.255.0
>Set ip route 0.0.0.0 160.1.1.1
>
>R1.
>Int e0
>Ip add 160.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
>No sh
>
>If R1 cannot see other routers' Ethernet addresses - how can the Cat5
>when for example you are asked to ensure connectivity to all routers
>from the Cat5? The VLANs exist on the cat5 say VLAN 10 = port 2/3 and
>is 170.1.1.1.1 on e0 on R1 and so on but they cannot see the switch.
>Must ip routing be configured in the network first when R1 can then see
>all other addresses before the switch has full connectivity to all other
>routers?
I'm not quite sure what your asking here. But if SC0 is in VLAN 20, then the r
outer with the same address space *must* be in the same VLAN as well. If it's
a trunk port, then VLAN 20 MUST be one of the vlans allowed in the trunk.
hsb
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:01 GMT-3