From: Jack S (prospectccie@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Mar 11 2002 - 16:43:34 GMT-3
Hi Stephen,
Yes it worked!!!
So, the behaviour is - "All Connected and IPX routes
are automatically redistributed into IPX EIGRP".
Thanks
Jack
--- Stephen Oliver <stevie_oliver@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> I got the same result.
>
> I then did
>
> # ipx router eigrp 13
> # no redist connected
>
> And the route disappeared. IPX Eigrp must also
> redist connected as well
> as RIP.
>
> Stephen.
>
> >From: Jack S <prospectccie@yahoo.com>
> >Reply-To: Jack S <prospectccie@yahoo.com>
> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: IPX EIGRP
> >Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 23:06:04 -0800 (PST)
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >A newbie question for all ccie gurus:
> >I am trying to run EIGRP between two frame-relay
> >multipoint peers. Here is my set up:
> >
> > s0.2 s0.2
> >R1 --------ipx net:130----------R2
> >lo0: netw 70 lo0: 80
> >
> >On both R1 & R2, the configs are:
> >ipx router eigrp 100
> > network 130
> >
> >ipx router rip
> > no network 130
> > no network 70 (on R1)
> > no network 80 (on R2)
> >
> >
> >With these configs, R1 is getting ipx network 80
> from
> >R2. Why is this happening? I didn't include 70/80
> >networks in any routing protocols. Still R1 is
> >receiving netw 80 from R2.
> >
> >Am I missing anything here? Please let me know.
> Thanks
> >in advance.
> >
> >Jack
> >
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:00 GMT-3