From: Sandro Ciffali (sandyccie@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Mar 16 2002 - 22:23:41 GMT-3
to add one more thing, all the ipx static routes are also redistribute in
ipx eigrp by default.
Sandro
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jack S" <prospectccie@yahoo.com>
To: "Stephen Oliver" <stevie_oliver@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: IPX EIGRP
> Hi Stephen,
> Yes it worked!!!
> So, the behaviour is - "All Connected and IPX routes
> are automatically redistributed into IPX EIGRP".
>
> Thanks
> Jack
>
>
>
> --- Stephen Oliver <stevie_oliver@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I got the same result.
> >
> > I then did
> >
> > # ipx router eigrp 13
> > # no redist connected
> >
> > And the route disappeared. IPX Eigrp must also
> > redist connected as well
> > as RIP.
> >
> > Stephen.
> >
> > >From: Jack S <prospectccie@yahoo.com>
> > >Reply-To: Jack S <prospectccie@yahoo.com>
> > >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: IPX EIGRP
> > >Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 23:06:04 -0800 (PST)
> > >
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >A newbie question for all ccie gurus:
> > >I am trying to run EIGRP between two frame-relay
> > >multipoint peers. Here is my set up:
> > >
> > > s0.2 s0.2
> > >R1 --------ipx net:130----------R2
> > >lo0: netw 70 lo0: 80
> > >
> > >On both R1 & R2, the configs are:
> > >ipx router eigrp 100
> > > network 130
> > >
> > >ipx router rip
> > > no network 130
> > > no network 70 (on R1)
> > > no network 80 (on R2)
> > >
> > >
> > >With these configs, R1 is getting ipx network 80
> > from
> > >R2. Why is this happening? I didn't include 70/80
> > >networks in any routing protocols. Still R1 is
> > >receiving netw 80 from R2.
> > >
> > >Am I missing anything here? Please let me know.
> > Thanks
> > >in advance.
> > >
> > >Jack
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:11 GMT-3