RE: Frame Zero CIR

From: Jim Newton (jnewton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Mar 11 2002 - 13:21:47 GMT-3


   
The only exception would be if you kept all of your traffic in your
provider's cloud, and they said that zero CIR is no problem. I used to work
for Ameritech, and in our LATA, our frame switches didn't even look at the
DE bits (at least that is what our frame engineers said). They had
over-engineered the backbone to handle three times the amount of traffic
that the edge could provide, to protect against a single device failure
causing them any problem. So in this case, having a zero CIR would not cause
any problem.

But if you left our LATA and crossed someone else's cloud, your traffic was
not safe.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
MADMAN
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:26 AM
To: A Yigit Zorlu
Cc: RSiddappa@NECBNS.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Frame Zero CIR

  I wouldn't recommend zero CIR unless you want to save some money and
the traffic your sending is minimal and not especially important. Like
Yigit alludes to, all packets are DE with zero CIR. We generally only
provide zero CIR if customers request it or they originate from some
other carrier that is zero CIR. Funny things happen when they CIRs
don't match.

  Dave

A Yigit Zorlu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In which bandwidth limit frames becoming discard eligible ? That has to be
> the value for CIR.
>
> Yigit
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> RSiddappa@NECBNS.com
> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 3:01 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Frame Zero CIR
>
> Hi
>
> Is it recommendable to have
>
> ZERO CIR on a frame circuit ( On the physical it is 128 Kbps and also in
the
> sub map-classit is configured as 128k )
>
> But the service provider is giving zero CIR.
>
> R.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:00 GMT-3