From: Shadi (ccie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Mar 11 2002 - 05:11:09 GMT-3
I don't think secondary interfaces will affect redistribution, IGRP will
never accept no classfull addresses to be redistributed inside it, only the
routing updates can get effected.
Please correct me if am wrong.
----- Original Message -----
From: "A Yigit Zorlu" <alec_cisco@yahoo.com>
To: "'C. Warren'" <chwarren@cox.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 10:19 PM
Subject: RE: Easy redistribution
> you can give secondary ip address to the serial interface between them
with
> the mask /27. Then it will pass that route to the neighbor.
>
>
> Yigit
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of C.
> Warren
> Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 4:41 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: FW: Easy redistribution
>
>
> You could make a static to null, then redistribute static into igrp.
>
> ip route 155.100.34.0 255.255.255.0 null 0
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> > Behalf Of Zakir A
> > Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 7:46 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Easy redistribution
> >
> >
> > I have 2 routers running IGRP between them on network
> > 155.100.1.0 /24 ?Is there any way of redistributing router
> > A's /27 interface (which is running OSPF on frame cloud) into
> > IGRP? I understand different methods such as summary-address
> > and range commands, but these will only work for networks not
> > connected to router A (at least that is what I am seeing).
> >
> >
> > Router A
> >
> > Interface serial 1
> > Ip add 155.100.34.1 255.255.255.224
> >
> > Interface serial 2
> > Ip add 155.100.1.1 255.255.255.0
> >
> >
> > Router B
> >
> > Interface serial 0
> > Ip add 155.100.1.2 255.255.255.0
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:00 GMT-3