Re: Variance with load balancing?

From: Erick B. (erickbe@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Mar 10 2002 - 05:36:08 GMT-3

• Next message: Erick B.: "Re: IOS Switch Uplink"
• Previous message: Lab Candidate: "IOS Switch Uplink"
• Maybe in reply to: Shadi: "Variance with load balancing?"
• Next in thread: Phil: "Re: Variance with load balancing?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
If you have fast-switching enabled (route-cache) it
will do per-destination. With per-packet (no ip
route-cache under interface) then it will use both
links.

If you're using CEF, then it's per destination by
default unless you configure it for per-packet.

--- Shadi <ccie@investorsgrp.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone tried the IGRP/EIGRP Variance for load
> balancing, it makes the
> routing table appear as if it is load balancing but
> it is not!!
>
> The packets are always send thru one path which is
> the thernet, so is variance
> only for making the routing table appear as if it is
> load balancing, or there
> is something wrong??

• Next message: Erick B.: "Re: IOS Switch Uplink"
• Previous message: Lab Candidate: "IOS Switch Uplink"
• Maybe in reply to: Shadi: "Variance with load balancing?"
• Next in thread: Phil: "Re: Variance with load balancing?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:58 GMT-3