From: Jaeheon Yoo (kghost@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Mar 08 2002 - 21:29:14 GMT-3
Well, as John and MADMAN said, Chuck did nothing wrong here,
As one of great contributors to this list, he just wanted to keep this list fro
m any trouble.
So, he gave the original poster the "thoughtful" caution in a "private" email.
Please look at this. It's a private email.
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Church, Chuck" <cchurch@USTA.com>
> > > To: "'Clark J'" <clark.j@163.com>
> > > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:33 PM
> > > Subject: RE: IPX EIGRP hold-time
Unfortunately, the original poster didn't pay attention to it and thought it wa
s one of normal emails from the list as some of us often thinks. So he replied
to the list with Chuck's original reply.
I don't mean to offend anyone, I just want to make it clear that Chuck did noth
ing wrong.
Jaeheon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ludwig Morales" <morales_l@hotmail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Cc: "Manny Gonzalez" <gonzalu@nyp.org>; <cchurch@USTA.com>; <clark.j@163.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: IPX EIGRP hold-time
> You people really amuse me, the only people that know this is exam material
> are the ones that actually took the exam so why don't you just let it slide
> and mail outside the group the person that committed the fault, by
> correcting him in public you emphasize the issue.
> Just my point of view.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Ludwig
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Manny Gonzalez" <gonzalu@nyp.org>
> To: "Clark J" <clark.j@163.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; "Church, Chuck" <cchurch@USTA.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 6:41 PM
> Subject: Re: IPX EIGRP hold-time
>
>
> > Hmmm, kind of saying
> >
> > "oops, sorry I got you pregnant, never mind... sorry.."
> >
> > :-))
> >
> > Clark J wrote:
> > >
> > > Sorry for the posting ,
> > >
> > > please ingore the mail ,
> > >
> > > thanks and regards,
> > >
> > > clarke j
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Church, Chuck" <cchurch@USTA.com>
> > > To: "'Clark J'" <clark.j@163.com>
> > > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:33 PM
> > > Subject: RE: IPX EIGRP hold-time
> > >
> > > > Watch the NDA.
> > > >
> > > > Chuck Church
> > > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > > CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
> > > > US Tennis Association
> > > > 70 W. Red Oak Lane
> > > > White Plains, NY 10604
> > > > 914-696-7199
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > > > Clark J
> > > > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 2:09 AM
> > > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > Subject: IPX EIGRP hold-time
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Do NOT use " IPX hold-time eigrp" command , how can I configure the
> holding
> > > > time of IPX eigrp to 30 seconds ?
> > > >
> > > > I know the default holding time is 15 seconds , and it is three times
> the
> > > > hello-interval. If the current value for the holding time is less than
> two
> > > > times the hello-interval, the holding time will be reset.
> > > >
> > > > I think maybe I configure the hello-interval to 10 secons , the
> holding time
> > > > will be set 30 seconds automatically , But in fact the holding time
> is
> > > > still 15 seconds , WHY ?
> > > >
> > > > Anybody have a solution ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance ,
> > > >
> > > > Clarke J
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:57 GMT-3