From: Tshon (tshon@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Mar 08 2002 - 21:36:12 GMT-3
First, all of you should realize that this is a convience. Cisco could
very easily shut it down, due to NDA violations
and then most of you CCIE want to be, would have no forum to discuss or
gain the insight or answers to your
quest for the Number.
In order to keep this and other forums alive, someone has to monitor
the group. What Chuck did and is doing
is a favor to us all. If you can't handle that then move to another
group. Most of you want all of the answers for
nothing, hence you will probably never get your Number.
So stop blaming him for keep this open.... get it.... keeping it
open, because once it's gone most of you are stuck.
Now, all of you have the same right, it is not just up to Chuck to
maintain the NDA so that tomorrow you can post your
questions. Again some of you have asked why did Chuck post this message
to the group. He didn't, and if reading is fundamental
you guys will obviously not be able to understand your material. Read
the whole thing and see who he sent the message to!
So, lets recap if you post something that seems to violate the
NDA... You'll hear it, not intentionally to the forum, privately
directed at you. And use more sense not to send the message to the
forum on the reply, you are not helping at that point!
Ludwig Morales wrote:
>You people really amuse me, the only people that know this is exam material
>are the ones that actually took the exam so why don't you just let it slide
>and mail outside the group the person that committed the fault, by
>correcting him in public you emphasize the issue.
>Just my point of view.
>
>Regards,
>
>
>Ludwig
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Manny Gonzalez" <gonzalu@nyp.org>
>To: "Clark J" <clark.j@163.com>
>Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; "Church, Chuck" <cchurch@USTA.com>
>Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 6:41 PM
>Subject: Re: IPX EIGRP hold-time
>
>
>>Hmmm, kind of saying
>>
>>"oops, sorry I got you pregnant, never mind... sorry.."
>>
>>:-))
>>
>>Clark J wrote:
>>
>>>Sorry for the posting ,
>>>
>>>please ingore the mail ,
>>>
>>>thanks and regards,
>>>
>>>clarke j
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Church, Chuck" <cchurch@USTA.com>
>>>To: "'Clark J'" <clark.j@163.com>
>>>Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:33 PM
>>>Subject: RE: IPX EIGRP hold-time
>>>
>>>>Watch the NDA.
>>>>
>>>>Chuck Church
>>>>Sr. Network Engineer
>>>>CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
>>>>US Tennis Association
>>>>70 W. Red Oak Lane
>>>>White Plains, NY 10604
>>>>914-696-7199
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>>>>Clark J
>>>>Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 2:09 AM
>>>>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>>>Subject: IPX EIGRP hold-time
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Do NOT use " IPX hold-time eigrp" command , how can I configure the
>>>>
>holding
>
>>>>time of IPX eigrp to 30 seconds ?
>>>>
>>>>I know the default holding time is 15 seconds , and it is three times
>>>>
>the
>
>>>>hello-interval. If the current value for the holding time is less than
>>>>
>two
>
>>>>times the hello-interval, the holding time will be reset.
>>>>
>>>>I think maybe I configure the hello-interval to 10 secons , the
>>>>
>holding time
>
>>>>will be set 30 seconds automatically , But in fact the holding time
>>>>
>is
>
>>>>still 15 seconds , WHY ?
>>>>
>>>>Anybody have a solution ?
>>>>
>>>>Thanks in advance ,
>>>>
>>>>Clarke J
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:57 GMT-3