From: MADMAN (dmadlan@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Mar 08 2002 - 20:19:08 GMT-3
What, Chuck didn't get anyone in trouble. The person who posted
Chuck's caution did!! If you think people aren't posting questions off
of tests looking for answers your naive. Chuck, it seems to me, simply
cautioned the poster PRIVATELY to whatch the NDA as he may hve
recognized the question. If it was just coincedence then little harm is
done until the caution was posted to the list.
It's not good etiquette to post private responses to a list, CHuck
didn't post the caution to the list and you seem to have missed that
point.
My $.02
dave
Roberto Iannuzzi wrote:
>
> Not according to Chuck Church, he is the one that gets the person in trouble
> by posting "watch the NDA". Even though it may be an honest question, Chuck
> brings unwanted attention to the original poser of the question, hence the
> slew of extra e-mails.
>
> Had he not made this statement, the question would have gone unnoticed,
> though read on as I believe this part is very important:
>
> **Chuck Church said: "Watch the NDA" to everyone in this group which means
> he thinks it is an exam question and is telling everyone it is**
>
> Is Chuck Church a Cisco employee representing Cisco on NDA issues?
>
> Any comments would be appreciated....
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ahmed Mamoor Amimi" <mamoor@ieee.org>
> To: "Roberto Iannuzzi" <twinturbos@sympatico.ca>; "Leonardo Pereira"
> <lpereira@br.ibm.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 4:41 PM
> Subject: Re: IPX EIGRP hold-time
>
> > I think this is a normal common question.... and there is nothing in it to
> > break the NDA.
> >
> > If i say how to configure ip address.... then this will also be breaking
> NDA
> > ... <g>
> >
> >
> > -Mamoor
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Roberto Iannuzzi <twinturbos@sympatico.ca>
> > To: Leonardo Pereira <lpereira@br.ibm.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 11:48 PM
> > Subject: Re: IPX EIGRP hold-time
> >
> >
> > > I agree. The only person breaking the NDA here is Chuck Church...
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Leonardo Pereira" <lpereira@br.ibm.com>
> > > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 1:26 PM
> > > Subject: Re: IPX EIGRP hold-time
> > >
> > >
> > > > Sorry, but why you said "watch the NDA" ?
> > > >
> > > > It is a question like any other. He can be found this question in a
> book
> > > > scenario. But after your statement, I am quite sure that in one exam
> > there
> > > > is a question like that. I really don't understand why some people in
> > this
> > > > list don't answer some question because of NDA. I think that NDA
> intend
> > to
> > > > prevent that someone arrive here and tell exact how is the exam (the
> > > > questions and etc).
> > > >
> > > > But I don't see the question below as a NDA violation. Am I wrong ???
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Leonardo.
> > > >
> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:57 GMT-3