From: Gregg Malcolm (greggm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Mar 08 2002 - 16:48:13 GMT-3
Look carefully at to whom Chuck replied to. Chuck did what a responsible
person would do. Clark J was the one who replied to Chuck and included this
list. In my opinion, if someone feels the need to blame someone, it is
certainly not Chuck. Chuck should be applauded for what he did.
Gregg
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roberto Iannuzzi" <twinturbos@sympatico.ca>
To: "Leonardo Pereira" <lpereira@br.ibm.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: IPX EIGRP hold-time
> I agree. The only person breaking the NDA here is Chuck Church...
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Leonardo Pereira" <lpereira@br.ibm.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 1:26 PM
> Subject: Re: IPX EIGRP hold-time
>
>
> > Sorry, but why you said "watch the NDA" ?
> >
> > It is a question like any other. He can be found this question in a book
> > scenario. But after your statement, I am quite sure that in one exam
there
> > is a question like that. I really don't understand why some people in
this
> > list don't answer some question because of NDA. I think that NDA intend
to
> > prevent that someone arrive here and tell exact how is the exam (the
> > questions and etc).
> >
> > But I don't see the question below as a NDA violation. Am I wrong ???
> >
> > Regards,
> > Leonardo.
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:57 GMT-3