From: kurt kruegel (kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Mar 08 2002 - 16:18:17 GMT-3
play nice kiddies.
as i see it the best way is to
1. read the nda.
2. if you don't understand it, consult a lawyer or someone qualified to
interpret said nda.
after that, each person's on his (or her) own.
Roberto Iannuzzi wrote:
> I agree. The only person breaking the NDA here is Chuck Church...
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Leonardo Pereira" <lpereira@br.ibm.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 1:26 PM
> Subject: Re: IPX EIGRP hold-time
>
> > Sorry, but why you said "watch the NDA" ?
> >
> > It is a question like any other. He can be found this question in a book
> > scenario. But after your statement, I am quite sure that in one exam there
> > is a question like that. I really don't understand why some people in this
> > list don't answer some question because of NDA. I think that NDA intend to
> > prevent that someone arrive here and tell exact how is the exam (the
> > questions and etc).
> >
> > But I don't see the question below as a NDA violation. Am I wrong ???
> >
> > Regards,
> > Leonardo.
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:57 GMT-3