Re: Router on a stick puzzle

From: Erick B. (erickbe@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:32:00 GMT-3


   
George,

One question on this just to clarify things...

Are you looking to source routes from 10.27.x.x and
have them received on a 10.1.x.x interface (no
secondarys)?

Can we put secondarys on all the routers involved so
the ethernet is multinetted in both IP subnets? If
this is ok, then I have it working (passive and
neighbor statements). See previous post.

The other way, I'm learning the routes when no
validate update source is configured but then the
problem is I don't have a route or interface for the
next-hop for that learned route. Tried some
policy-routing and local policy routing with no
success yet.

Interesting puzzle... Erick

--- George Hansen <HansenG@radiological.com> wrote:
> Here's a puzzle I came across in a production
> network:
>
> 1) Using one Ethernet port, configure a router to
> route between network 10.1.0.0/16 and network
> 10.27.0.0/16. Both networks exist on the same LAN.
> VLAN trunking is not allowed. One static route is
> allowed.
>
> 2) Advertise a route to 10.27.0.0 to network
> 10.1.0.0 using RIP or EIGRP.
>
> I've gotten part 1 to work, but haven't gotten part
> 2 yet.
>
> George Hansen, CCIE # 8546



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:56 GMT-3