From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi (mamoor@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Mar 07 2002 - 22:14:59 GMT-3
how about this paper :
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/556/nat-on-stick.html
Close to it...
-Mamoor
----- Original Message -----
From: Erick B. <erickbe@yahoo.com>
To: George Hansen <HansenG@radiological.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 5:32 AM
Subject: Re: Router on a stick puzzle
> George,
>
> One question on this just to clarify things...
>
> Are you looking to source routes from 10.27.x.x and
> have them received on a 10.1.x.x interface (no
> secondarys)?
>
> Can we put secondarys on all the routers involved so
> the ethernet is multinetted in both IP subnets? If
> this is ok, then I have it working (passive and
> neighbor statements). See previous post.
>
> The other way, I'm learning the routes when no
> validate update source is configured but then the
> problem is I don't have a route or interface for the
> next-hop for that learned route. Tried some
> policy-routing and local policy routing with no
> success yet.
>
> Interesting puzzle... Erick
>
> --- George Hansen <HansenG@radiological.com> wrote:
> > Here's a puzzle I came across in a production
> > network:
> >
> > 1) Using one Ethernet port, configure a router to
> > route between network 10.1.0.0/16 and network
> > 10.27.0.0/16. Both networks exist on the same LAN.
> > VLAN trunking is not allowed. One static route is
> > allowed.
> >
> > 2) Advertise a route to 10.27.0.0 to network
> > 10.1.0.0 using RIP or EIGRP.
> >
> > I've gotten part 1 to work, but haven't gotten part
> > 2 yet.
> >
> > George Hansen, CCIE # 8546
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:56 GMT-3