From: Lionel Florit (lflorit@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Mar 06 2002 - 03:07:57 GMT-3
That's a good URL (let's hope it's updated ;-) )
you're correct about the mapping
A Lite config would look like (dlci 30):
dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface serial 1 30
frame-relay map llc2 30
note: the last command doesn't work on point-to-point sub-interface. Put
"frame interface-dlci 30 " instead.
a DLSw direct would be
dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface serial 1 30 passthru
frame-relay map dlsw 30
Lionel
At 05:48 PM 3/6/2002 +1100, Jason Sinclair wrote:
>Lionel,
>
>Thanks for the response, however based on the following DLSW support matrix
>from Cisco:
>
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/tech/dls24_rg.htm
><http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/tech/dls24_rg.htm>
>
>and also a case I have raised with the TAC, they seem to believe from 12.0
>it supports ethernet-ethernet as well?
>
>I agree with your comments, and am after Cisco to clarify this. Also, when
>you omit the pass-thru keyword you need to map dlsw instead of llc2 - right?
>
>When I hear from the TAC will let you know their response.
>
>Thanks and cheers,
>
>Jason
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lionel Florit [mailto:lflorit@cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 March 2002 15:31
> To: Jason Sinclair
> Cc: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: Re: DLSW issue
>
> Jason,
>
> DLSw direct will have DLSw encapsulated directly over frame
>relay or
> hdlc. It's only supported on token ring to token ring
>connections. All
> keep alive go through end to end. it's not a reliable
>transport. Queuing is
> also problem
>
> DLSw Lite rides over LLC2 as you mentioned. It provides
>reliable transport
> and is not limited to token ring to token ring connections
>(also supports
> ethernet, SDLC, QLLC end systems)
>
> configuration of both is very similar except you omit the
>"pass-through"
> keyword for DLSw lite.
>
> Lionel
>
> At 11:44 AM 3/6/2002 +1100, Jason Sinclair wrote:
> >All,
> >
> >Can someone please explain what defines the difference
>between DLSW Direct
> >encaps and DLSW lite. I believe that DIRECT is where you
>use DLSW as the
> >transport and thus need pass-thru and the statement
>frame-relay map dlsw
> >dlci. Whereas with lite you use frame-map llc2 dlci and do
>not use
> >pass-thru. I am having problems with direct with pass-thru
>and have raised a
> >TAC case.
> >
> >Any ideas?
> >
> >Jason Sinclair
> >Manager, Network Support Group
> >POWERTEL
> >Ground Level, 55 Clarence Street,
> >SYDNEY NSW 2000
> >AUSTRALIA
> >office: + 61 2 8264 3820
> >mobile: + 61 416 105 858
> >* sinclairj@powertel.com.au
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> >**********************************************************************
> >PowerTel Limited, winners of
> >Broadband Wholesale Carrier of the year, CommsWorld
>Telecomms Awards 2001
> >Best Emerging Telco, Australian Telecom Awards 2001
> >
>
> >**********************************************************************
> >This email (including all attachments) is intended solely
>for the named
> >addressee. It is confidential and may contain commercially
>sensitive
> >information. If you receive it in error, please let us know
>by reply email,
> >delete it from your system and destroy any copies.
> >
> >This email is also subject to copyright. No part of it
>should be reproduced,
> >adapted or transmitted without the prior written consent of
>the copyright
> >owner.
> >
> >Emails may be interfered with, may contain computer viruses
>or other defects
> >and may not be successfully replicated on other systems. We
>give no
> >warranties in relation to these matters. If you have any
>doubts about
> >the authenticity of an email purportedly sent by us, please
>contact us
> >immediately.
> >
>
> >**********************************************************************
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:54 GMT-3