From: RSiddappa@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue Mar 05 2002 - 02:24:22 GMT-3
Mamoor,
Did u try with the Access-list and thensee what happens.
R.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi [mailto:mamoor@ieee.org]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:58 PM
To: ying chang; kghost@chollian.net; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: All about "distance" command - compact summary.
It is for the out going routes (generated on in the box) ... i was talking
about the routes that are in coming and applying distance to them.......
this is not possible in OSPF so u have to talk to the other command. and
apply the distance to either external ,inter-area , intra-area.
i wasted a hell lot of time to judge this behaviour....
I wanted to increase distance of a particular route that is coming but i was
not able to ... yes it allows me to change the
distance of whole routes that are in the routing table but not a single
one....
try it ur self... let me know if i am wrong
-Mamoor
----- Original Message -----
From: ying chang <ying_c@hotmail.com>
To: <kghost@chollian.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; <mamoor@ieee.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: All about "distance" command - compact summary.
> Hi guys,
>
> Thanks for the sharing. I can see I could use the distance command to
avoid
> routing loops in redistribution or blocking routes like examples in Doyle
I.
> Can you think of anything else we might use it?
>
> Thanks,
> Chang
>
>
> >From: "Jaeheon Yoo" <kghost@chollian.net>
> >Reply-To: "Jaeheon Yoo" <kghost@chollian.net>
> >To: "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>, "Ahmed Mamoor Amimi"
> ><mamoor@ieee.org>
> >Subject: Re: All about "distance" command - compact summary.
> >Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 11:00:11 +0900
> >
> >Hi, Ahmed
> >
> >Thanks for the interest.
> >Actually following two commands are mutually exclusive.
> >
> >Under OSPF:
> > distance 110
> > distance ospf external 110 inter-area 110 intra-area 110
> >
> >In the begging, I thought like you, but in a test it worked as planned.(I
> >tested it on IOS 12.1(5)T10, 12.0(4)T)
> >I think this command designer thought it would be ok to assign the same
AD
> >to all ospf routes by a simpler command, whatever route type they have.
> >I like this behavior because all three route types start with the same
> >default AD!!
> >But with the second command, you can make it more granular by route type.
> >
> >Please look at this:
> >
> >Rack02R6#sh ip route
> >Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
> > D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
> > N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
> > E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
> > i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, * - candidate
> >default
> > U - per-user static route, o - ODR
> >
> >Gateway of last resort is not set
> >
> > 152.34.0.0/24 is subnetted, 7 subnets
> >C 152.34.46.0 is directly connected, Serial1
> >O E2 152.34.26.0 [110/20] via 152.34.46.4, 00:02:57, Serial1
> >O IA 152.34.24.0 [110/128] via 152.34.46.4, 00:15:50, Serial1
> >O IA 152.34.20.0 [110/129] via 152.34.46.4, 00:01:21, Serial1
> >O IA 152.34.2.0 [110/129] via 152.34.46.4, 00:15:50, Serial1
> >C 152.34.6.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
> >O 152.34.4.0 [110/65] via 152.34.46.4, 00:15:50, Serial1
> >Rack02R6#conf t
> >Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
> >Rack02R6(config)#router ospf 1
> >Rack02R6(config-router)#distance 70
> >Rack02R6(config-router)#^Z
> >Rack02R6#sh ip
> >00:54:04: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console
> >Rack02R6#sh ip route
> >Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
> > D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
> > N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
> > E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
> > i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, * - candidate
> >default
> > U - per-user static route, o - ODR
> >
> >Gateway of last resort is not set
> >
> > 152.34.0.0/24 is subnetted, 7 subnets
> >C 152.34.46.0 is directly connected, Serial1
> >O E2 152.34.26.0 [70/20] via 152.34.46.4, 00:00:04, Serial1
> >O IA 152.34.24.0 [70/128] via 152.34.46.4, 00:00:04, Serial1
> >O IA 152.34.20.0 [70/129] via 152.34.46.4, 00:00:04, Serial1
> >O IA 152.34.2.0 [70/129] via 152.34.46.4, 00:00:04, Serial1
> >C 152.34.6.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
> >O 152.34.4.0 [70/65] via 152.34.46.4, 00:00:04, Serial1
> >Rack02R6#
> >
> >Regards,
> >Jaeheon
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Ahmed Mamoor Amimi" <mamoor@ieee.org>
> >To: "Jaeheon Yoo" <kghost@chollian.net>; "ccielab"
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 6:22 AM
> >Subject: Re: All about "distance" command - compact summary.
> >
> >
> > > I disagree with u on OSPF
> > > distance 110 (OSPF)
> > >
> > > This command dont work under OSPF
> > > u have to use this command for changing distance :
> > > distance ospf external 110 inter-area 110 intra-area 110 (OSPF)
> > >
> > >
> > > -Mamoor
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Jaeheon Yoo <kghost@chollian.net>
> > > To: ccielab <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:32 PM
> > > Subject: All about "distance" command - compact summary.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi, all.
> > > > I've summarized all about "distance" command that I can find out
> >through
> > > my own lab.
> > > > I think this summary may be helpful to some of you.
> > > > Any comments will be welcomed, And please correct me if I'm wrong.
> > > >
> > > > Jaeheon,
> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:53 GMT-3