From: alain faure (alainfaure@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Mar 04 2002 - 17:04:08 GMT-3
Hi,
yes, but i see always the two route on the other router. i don't understand why
i m missing something about this kind of access list
Thank's
--- Lionel Florit <lflorit@cisco.com> a icrit : > Alain,
>
> have you tried
> router rip
> distribute-list 150 out Serial0
>
> access-list 150 deny ip host 100.1.0.0 host 255.255.255.0
> access-list 150 permit ip any any
>
> Lionel
>
> At 08:11 PM 3/4/2002 +0100, alain faure wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >What i try is very simple but...won't work (i already read the archive
> >with out
> >succes):
> >
> >In RIP or EIGRP on a router there is two route (100.1.0.0/16 and
> 100.1.0.0/24)
> >I want to send ONLY the 100.10.0.0/16 to an other router.
> >
> >I would like to know how to do with access-list and prefix-list (if
> possible).
> >
> >rip/eigrp 1
> > distribute-list .... out serial 0
> > distribute-list prefix .... out serial 0
> >
> >And mainly how to configure access and prefix list ?
> >
> >
> >Thank's a lot
> >
> > --- Paul Borghese <pborghese@groupstudy.com> a icrit : > Ugh, of
> > course! This
> >is something that I seem to need to re-learn about
> > > once a year. Thanks for the help! Now if only I can get my EIGRP
> > > authentication to reliably work....
> > >
> > > Paul
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Jaeheon Yoo" <kghost@chollian.net>
> > > To: "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; "John Neiberger"
> <neiby@ureach.com>
> > > Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 7:22 PM
> > > Subject: Re: distribution lists in RIP
> > >
> > >
> > > > Yes, this is intuitively very confusing.
> > > > So, I always think this command by adding "of" before a routing
> protocol.
> > > >
> > > > distribute-list 1 out (of) ospf 1
> > > > <<-------------
> > > >
> > > > distribute-list 1 out int serial 0
> > > > --------->>
> > > >
> > > > Jaeheon,
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "John Neiberger" <neiby@ureach.com>
> > > > To: "Paul Borghese" <pborghese@groupstudy.com>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 7:34 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: distribution lists in RIP
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This is one of those things that confuses me all the time.
> > > > >
> > > > > > router rip
> > > > > > distribute-list 1 out ospf 1
> > > > >
> > > > > Intuitively, at least to me, this says to filter RIP routes
> > > > > that match access-list 1 when redistributing to OSPF 1.
> > > > > However, I don't think that's what it really does.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it means "When redistributing routes from OSPF 1 into
> > > > > RIP, filter out routes that match access list 1 before sending
> > > > > them to other RIP neighbors." If I'm wrong I hope someone will
> > > > > correct me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > John
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ---- On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, Paul Borghese
> > > > > (pborghese@groupstudy.com) wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I have a configuration where I would like to redistribute
> > > > > from RIP to
> > > > > > OSPF.
> > > > > > I would prefer to apply a filter to limit my distributions.
> > > > > I am
> > > > > > running
> > > > > > RIP on an ethernet interface and OSPF on a serial interface.
> > > > > When I
> > > > > > apply
> > > > > > the command:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > router rip
> > > > > > distribute-list 1 out ospf 1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It filters the RIP updates out the ethernet interface. So
> > > > > the router
> > > > > > seems
> > > > > > to ignore the fact that I told it to only filter when
> > > > > redistrbuting into
> > > > > > OSPF and instead filters regular rip updates. Here is some
> > > > > debugging
> > > > > > output:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Before applying distribute-list 1 out ospf:
> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > ------
> > > > > > 02:24:10: RIP: sending v1 update to 255.255.255.255 via
> > > > > Ethernet0
> > > > > > (190.27.2.3)
> > > > > > 02:24:10: RIP: build update entries
> > > > > > 02:24:10: network 87.0.0.0 metric 7
> > > > > > 02:24:10: network 180.70.0.0 metric 7
> > > > > > 02:24:10: subnet 190.27.1.0 metric 7
> > > > > > 02:24:10: subnet 190.27.10.0 metric 7
> > > > > > 02:24:10: subnet 190.27.11.0 metric 7
> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > -----------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Notice there are a number of routes being advertised out E0.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Now I will apply the command:
> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > --------------
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > R7(config-router)#router rip
> > > > > > R7(config-router)#distribute-list 1 out ospf 1
> > > > > > R7(config-router)#
> > > > > > 02:24:15: RIP: Distribute-list changed: sending triggered
> > > > > update
> > > > > > R7(config-router)#
> > > > > > 02:24:35: RIP: sending v1 update to 255.255.255.255 via
> > > > > Ethernet0
> > > > > > (190.27.2.3)
> > > > > > 02:24:35: RIP: build update entries - suppressing null update
> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > --------------
> > > > > > --------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Notice the update did not have any entries. So the command
> > > > > > distribute-list
> > > > > > 1 out ospf 1 blocks routes from leaving the ethernet
> > > > > interface.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Paul Borghese
> > > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:52 GMT-3