From: John Neiberger (neiby@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Mar 03 2002 - 03:28:39 GMT-3
Just for grins, I tried to find out what summary-address does
under BGP in 11.2 but I wasn't able to find a reference for
it. The 11.2 Command Reference says that command is only for
OSPF and IS-IS, which is what I expected.
Still, it's interesting that the router let me make this
particular mistake in the BGP config. Oh well, like I said,
time to go to bed. I'll sleep off my embarrassment. :-)
John
---- On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, John Neiberger (neiby@ureach.com)
wrote:
> oops....What the heck was I thinking?? That's a sure sign
I've
> been studying too long today. I know very well the
difference
> between summary-address and aggregate-address and I still was
> using the wrong command! Good grief...
>
> And even while I was typing my first post I had this nagging
> feeling that I was overlooking something. :-) Maybe I
should
> have tried using the BGP area range command. heh heh...
>
> I think I didn't catch my mistake because another router
> running 11.2(25a) accepted the command. Now I'm interested
to
> find out what that particular command is doing.
>
> This is actually one of my biggest worries when I get to the
> actual lab. I fear that stuff I've done over and over again
> will completely slip my mind.
>
> Okay, I'm done for the night!
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
> ---- On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, Nigel Taylor
> (nigel_taylor@hotmail.com) wrote:
>
> > John,
> > You might want to try using the aggregate-address
> command and
> > see
> > what magic happens. As a side note.. IGP's summarize,
> whereas BGP being
> > an
> > EGP aggregates.
> >
> > watch the word wrap..
> >
> >
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/
> 122cgcr/fipr
> > rp_r/bgp_r/1rfbgp1.htm#xtocid1
> >
> > Nigel
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John Neiberger" <neiby@ureach.com>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 12:30 AM
> > Subject: Summarization?? What's that? (bug report)
> >
> >
> > > While attempting to summarize some prefixes in BGP I got
the
> > > following:
> > >
> > > R3#conf t
> > > Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with
> CNTL/Z.
> > > R3(config)#router bgp 2010
> > > R3(config-router)#summa?
> > > % Unrecognized command
> > > R3(config-router)#summar?
> > > % Unrecognized command
> > > R3(config-router)#summar
> > > ^
> > > % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
> > >
> > > R3(config-router)#?
> > > Router configuration commands:
> > > address-family Enter Address Family command mode
> > > aggregate-address Configure BGP aggregate entries
> > > auto-summary Enable automatic network number
> > > summarization
> > > bgp BGP specific commands
> > > default Set a command to its defaults
> > > default-information Control distribution of default
> > > information
> > > default-metric Set metric of redistributed routes
> > > distance Define an administrative distance
> > > distribute-list Filter networks in routing updates
> > > exit Exit from routing protocol
> configuration
> > > mode
> > > help Description of the interactive help
> > > system
> > > maximum-paths Forward packets over multiple paths
> > > neighbor Specify a neighbor router
> > > network Specify a network to announce via
BGP
> > > no Negate a command or set its
defaults
> > > redistribute Redistribute information from
another
> > > routing protocol
> > > synchronization Perform IGP synchronization
> > > table-map Map external entry attributes into
> > > routing table
> > > timers Adjust routing timers
> > >
> > > R3(config-router)#
> > >
> > > I'm thinking it might be tough to do summarization when
the
> > > freaking command is missing!!
> > >
> > > This is a 2500 running 12.1(11) Enterprise Plus. Too
> weird. I
> > > didn't find a bug report for it on CCO but I can't be the
> only
> > > person to run into this.
> > >
> > > Since I don't feel like doing un upgrade right now, I'll
> skip
> > > that part. <g>
> > >
> > > John
> > >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:51 GMT-3