RE: Manipulate administrative distance

From: Wade Edwards (wade.edwards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Mar 01 2002 - 19:17:43 GMT-3


   
B and C will not work. I tried to enter the commands and it will only
allow one distance command to that destination. At least on version
12.1(5)T.

L8r.

 -----Original Message-----
From: Bob Sinclair [mailto:bsin@erols.com]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 2:34 PM
To: ying chang
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Manipulate administrative distance

I think this would work. I assume the IP address of R3 is 150.100.11.1.

router igrp 100
network 150.100.0.0
network 160.100.0.0
distance 105
distance 150.100.11.1 0.0.0.0 150 1
distance 150.100.11.1 0.0.0.0 192 2

access-list 1 permit 150.100.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 2 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

I believe this says that:

a) the default distance is 105

b)routes from 150.100.11.1 that match access-list 1 will have distance
150

c) routes from 150.100.11.1 that match access-list 2 will have distance
192

----- Original Message -----
From: "ying chang" <ying_c@hotmail.com>
To: <wade.edwards@powerupnetworks.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 2:57 PM
Subject: RE: Manipulate administrative distance

> Hopefully I can learn how to use it correctly. The CDROM
>
http://127.0.0.1:8080/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_r/ipr
prt2/1rdindep.htm#xtocid172612
> has a few examples, but I could not make them work for me.
>
> Let's get back to my original question, R3 passes 192.168.1.0/24 and
> 172.160.0.0/16 to R2, how can I change their AD to 192 and 172
respectively?
> As you can see from the sample output, it does work on 150.100.1.0/24
and
> 150.100.2.0/24 which was passed from R1 and was changed to 130. Am I
missing
> something here?
>
> By the way, please ignore my comment on subnet 172. Doyle I chap 13
has some
> examples with acl.
>
> Below is the output from debug ip igrp tran:
>
> r2#debug ip igrp trans
> IGRP protocol debugging is on
> r2#
> 06:51:25: IGRP: received update from 150.100.11.1 on Serial1
> 06:51:25: subnet 150.100.50.0, metric 160350 (neighbor 158350)
> 06:51:25: subnet 150.100.2.0, metric 160350 (neighbor 158350)
> 06:51:25: subnet 150.100.1.0, metric 10576 (neighbor 8576)
> 06:51:25: subnet 150.100.10.0, metric 8576 (neighbor 1100)
> 06:51:25: IGRP: received update from 160.100.77.125 on Ethernet0
> 06:51:25: network 172.160.0.0, metric 1600 (neighbor 501)
> 06:51:25: network 192.168.1.0, metric 1600 (neighbor 501)
> r2#
>
> Thanks,
> Chang
>
>
> >From: "Wade Edwards" <wade.edwards@powerupnetworks.com>
> >To: "ying chang" <ying_c@hotmail.com>
> >CC: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: RE: Manupulate administrative distance
> >Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 13:10:05 -0600
> >
> >I think you are not understanding the distance command. The IP
address
> >and wildcard mask is used to change the distance of the routes
learned
> >from the neighbor specified by the IP address and wildcard mask. The
IP
> >address and wildcard mask does not apply to the routes themselves.
> >
> >HTH L8r.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >From: ying chang [mailto:ying_c@hotmail.com]
> >Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:03 PM
> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: Manupulate administrative distance
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >Can someone explain to me why I got 105 instead of 172 and 192 from
the
> >distance command I have in my config? The toplogy is
> >
> >OSPF/IGRP redistribution point
>
>(150.100.1.0,150.100.2.0,150.100.50.0)<-150.100.11.0->R2/IGRP<-160.100.
0
> >.0-->R3/IGRP(172.16.0.0,192.168.1.0)
> >
> >IGRP is the only protocol that is used in R2. Config and output are
at
> >the
> >bottom of the message. I have comments in my config for what I'm
trying
> >to
> >do.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Chang
> >
> >router igrp 100
> >timers basic 10 30 30 60
> >network 150.100.0.0
> >network 160.100.0.0
> >distance 105 <-- Change default to 105
> >distance 130 150.100.0.0 0.0.255.255 sub150 <-- modify 150.100.1.0
and
> >2.0
> >to 130
> >distance 192 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 sub192 <-- modify 192.168.1.0 to
192
> >distance 172 172.160.0.0 0.0.255.255 <-- Doyle's sample does not use
> >access-list
> >!
> >!
> >ip access-list standard sub150
> >permit 150.100.1.0 0.0.0.255
> >permit 150.100.2.0 0.0.0.255
> >ip access-list standard sub192
> >permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
> >
> >----------------------------------------
> >Interfaces:
> >
> >r2#siib
> >Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
> >
> >Prot
> >ocol
> >Ethernet0 160.100.77.121 YES NVRAM up
> >
> >up
> >
> >Ethernet1 unassigned YES NVRAM
administratively
> >down
> >down
> >
> >Serial0 unassigned YES NVRAM
administratively
> >down
> >down
> >
> >Serial1 150.100.11.2 YES NVRAM up
> >
> >up
> >------------------------------------------
> >Routing table:
> >
> >r2#sir
> >Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B -
BGP
> > D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter
area
> > N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type
2
> > E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
> > i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS
> >inter
> >area
> > * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
> > P - periodic downloaded static route
> >
> >Gateway of last resort is not set
> >
> >I 172.160.0.0/16 [105/1600] via 160.100.77.125, 00:00:07,
Ethernet0
> ><---
> >???
> > 160.100.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> >C 160.100.77.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
> >I 192.168.1.0/24 [105/1600] via 160.100.77.125, 00:00:07,
Ethernet0
> ><---
> >???
> > 150.100.0.0/24 is subnetted, 5 subnets
> >I 150.100.50.0 [105/160350] via 150.100.11.1, 00:00:04, Serial1
> >I 150.100.2.0 [130/160350] via 150.100.11.1, 00:00:04, Serial1
> ><---
> >Modified
> >I 150.100.1.0 [130/10576] via 150.100.11.1, 00:00:04, Serial1
> ><---
> >Modified
> >I 150.100.10.0 [105/8576] via 150.100.11.1, 00:00:05, Serial1
> >C 150.100.11.0 is directly connected, Serial1
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:50 GMT-3