From: Howard C. Berkowitz (hcb@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Mar 01 2002 - 12:58:34 GMT-3
At 4:23 PM +0100 3/1/02, Merete Asak wrote:
>Hi there,
>
>I can't seem to find a good example for this anywhere so I'll try here.
>
>If you were told to get all your IGP-routes (no summary) into your EBGP
>without redistributing one way or the other, what would you do? Would
>the only way be to add all the nets one by one in the BGP-process?
>
>
>Cheers,
>
>Merete
First, I'd start by asking "what is the problem you are trying to
solve?" Is this a scenario from some source? I say this because
it's Very Bad Real-World Practice _ever_ to have _all_ your IGP
routes in your EGP, or vice versa. I recognize that redistribution
scenarios to do silly things like this still are likely to appear on
the lab exam.
Second, yes, you could probably do that. IIRC, there used to be a
limit of 200 network statements under the BGP router command, but
this restriction was removed or relaxed in a fairly recent release.
Doing what you are suggesting still might not be very scalable.
-- "What Problem are you trying to solve?" ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not directly to me*** ******************************************************************************* * Howard C. Berkowitz hcb@gettcomm.com Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications Technical Director, CertificationZone.com "retired" Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:50 GMT-3