From: ying chang (ying_c@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Mar 01 2002 - 16:23:31 GMT-3
Hi,
How about "set spantree priority 65535"? 65535 is the highest number you can
go. In case everybody use that number, we will have to go back to the same
selection process though.
Chang
>From: "Clark J" <clark.j@163.com>
>Reply-To: "Clark J" <clark.j@163.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>, "alain faure" <alainfaure@yahoo.fr>
>Subject: Re: a question on SPANTREE
>Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 02:41:32 +0800
>
>Alain , thanks for your reply .
>Does anybody have a better solution except disable spantree on this VLAN ?
>thanks again,
>Clarke
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "alain faure" <alainfaure@yahoo.fr>
>To: "Clark J" <clark.j@163.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 2:23 AM
>Subject: Re: a question on SPANTREE
>
>
> > hi,
> >
> > that's interresting question, and we have a long debate on this with
>some of my
> > friends about one of our customer site.
> >
> > for me, i think the better way (but they don't agree with me) is to
>disable
> > spanning tree on the VLAN for the switch you don't want they become root
>? What
> > do you think about ?
> >
> > best regards
> >
> >
> > --- Clark J <clark.j@163.com> a icrit : > Dear CCIEs and Near CCIEs,
> > > How to configure a switch so that it can't become the root switch in
>VLAN A
> > > ?
> > > Best regards,
> > > Clarke J
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:50 GMT-3