From: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki (karwas@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Feb 22 2002 - 16:12:11 GMT-3
Group,
Simple question:
Is it possible to create virtual link (connect virtual areas)
using interface address instead of OSPF router ID?
Cisco documentation says:
area <area-id> virtual-link <router-id>
Obviously, using RID is better for stability reasons,
but one can imagine hyphothetical situation when OSPF RID
is not in routing table, so it would not be reachable for
virtual-link.
Comments?
Thanks,
Przemek
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:30 GMT-3