From: Jason Sinclair (sinclairj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Feb 22 2002 - 01:50:06 GMT-3
http://www.llecointe.com/ <http://www.llecointe.com/>
Jason Sinclair
Manager, Network Support Group
POWERTEL
Ground Level, 55 Clarence Street,
SYDNEY NSW 2000
AUSTRALIA
office: + 61 2 8264 3820
mobile: + 61 416 105 858
* sinclairj@powertel.com.au
-----Original Message-----
From: Narvaez, Pablo [mailto:Pablo.Narvaez@getronics.com]
Sent: Friday, 22 February 2002 13:19
To: David Siwula; Troy Rader; Michael Kilpatrick;
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Logging server
Does anyone know where I can get a simple but useful logging
server ? (for free of course :-)) ... some kinda freeware, shareware or
something like that ... ?
-----Original Message-----
From: David Siwula [mailto:DSiwula@ditech.com]
Sent: Jueves, 21 de Febrero de 2002 09:01 p.m.
To: 'Troy Rader'; David Siwula; 'Michael Kilpatrick';
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: OT RE: RE: 6500 Hybrid or Natural IOS
Troy..
That is exactly what I meant...
"Native" IOS - When the switch supervisor and L3 device
(MSFC, MSFC2)
operate as one device.
"Hybrid" IOS - When the switch supervisor and L3 device
(MSFC, MSFC2)
operate separately, running independent versions of software
(CAT OS and
IOS).
I have just run into some weird problems with the "native"
ios. It is just
a matter of personal preference and experience.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Troy Rader [mailto:troy@onenet.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 6:23 PM
To: David Siwula; 'Michael Kilpatrick';
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: RE: 6500 Hybrid or Natural IOS
Dave,
When you said "hybrid...less scalable", did you mean Native?
If you did
mean Native, they have an "interface range" command that
allows you to apply
interface changes to a range, similar to what can be done
with CatOS. If
you did mean hybrid, I don't follow what you said. Could
you elaborate?
Thanks,
Troy
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Siwula" <DSiwula@ditech.com>
To: "'Michael Kilpatrick'" <mjkilpat@yahoo.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 7:37 PM
Subject: OT: RE: 6500 Hybrid or Natural IOS
> Michael....
> I would say it depends. I always thought it would be best
to keep the
> switching and routing independent of each other, which is
why I like the
> traditional Cat OS. I have used this with msm's (using
port channels) and
> msfc's. If you have not used the old cat os, then the
hybrid would
probably
> be easier to configure. The hybrid is in my opinion, less
scalable
though.
> For example, to configure switchports to be part of a
specific vlan you
have
> to go into each interface. Just my thoughts....
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Kilpatrick [mailto:mjkilpat@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 5:27 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: OT: 6500 Hybrid or Natural IOS
>
> Getting ready to start testing with new 6500's....
interested in your
> opinion
> on the best operating mode to run these guys in: Hybrid or
IOS?
>
> Thanks!
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:30 GMT-3