From: Gregg Malcolm (greggm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Feb 22 2002 - 00:56:06 GMT-3
Provided that you asking for a syslog server, Kiwi makes an excellent and
free application.
HTH, Gregg
----- Original Message -----
From: "Narvaez, Pablo" <Pablo.Narvaez@getronics.com>
To: "David Siwula" <DSiwula@ditech.com>; "Troy Rader" <troy@onenet.net>;
"Michael Kilpatrick" <mjkilpat@yahoo.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 7:19 PM
Subject: Logging server
> Does anyone know where I can get a simple but useful logging server ? (for
free of course :-)) ... some kinda freeware, shareware or something like
that ... ?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Siwula [mailto:DSiwula@ditech.com]
> Sent: Jueves, 21 de Febrero de 2002 09:01 p.m.
> To: 'Troy Rader'; David Siwula; 'Michael Kilpatrick';
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: OT RE: RE: 6500 Hybrid or Natural IOS
>
>
> Troy..
> That is exactly what I meant...
>
> "Native" IOS - When the switch supervisor and L3 device (MSFC, MSFC2)
> operate as one device.
>
> "Hybrid" IOS - When the switch supervisor and L3 device (MSFC, MSFC2)
> operate separately, running independent versions of software (CAT OS and
> IOS).
>
> I have just run into some weird problems with the "native" ios. It is
just
> a matter of personal preference and experience.
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Troy Rader [mailto:troy@onenet.net]
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 6:23 PM
> To: David Siwula; 'Michael Kilpatrick'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: RE: 6500 Hybrid or Natural IOS
>
> Dave,
>
> When you said "hybrid...less scalable", did you mean Native? If you did
> mean Native, they have an "interface range" command that allows you to
apply
> interface changes to a range, similar to what can be done with CatOS. If
> you did mean hybrid, I don't follow what you said. Could you elaborate?
>
> Thanks,
> Troy
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Siwula" <DSiwula@ditech.com>
> To: "'Michael Kilpatrick'" <mjkilpat@yahoo.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 7:37 PM
> Subject: OT: RE: 6500 Hybrid or Natural IOS
>
>
> > Michael....
> > I would say it depends. I always thought it would be best to keep the
> > switching and routing independent of each other, which is why I like the
> > traditional Cat OS. I have used this with msm's (using port channels)
and
> > msfc's. If you have not used the old cat os, then the hybrid would
> probably
> > be easier to configure. The hybrid is in my opinion, less scalable
> though.
> > For example, to configure switchports to be part of a specific vlan you
> have
> > to go into each interface. Just my thoughts....
> > Dave
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Kilpatrick [mailto:mjkilpat@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 5:27 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: OT: 6500 Hybrid or Natural IOS
> >
> > Getting ready to start testing with new 6500's.... interested in your
> > opinion
> > on the best operating mode to run these guys in: Hybrid or IOS?
> >
> > Thanks!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:30 GMT-3