From: emonk@xxxxxxx
Date: Thu Feb 21 2002 - 21:00:17 GMT-3
Guys,
The default behavior is as follows:
According to the Cisco Doc CD. If you create a static
route that has as the default destination a connected
interface or is a network that is included in the RIP
routing on the router it will be automatically
redistributed because it is treated as a connected route.
Hopefully this helps.
> Seems to get the same results whether it's using a next-hop address or
> outbound interface. I did see a bug that looked similar but it only
> happened when you also had "ip default-network" configured according to
> the bug report. Better to catch this change in behavior (bug?) now than
> during the lab I suppose. By the way, I'm using 12.1.9 on 2500s to test
> this.
> George
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Steven Weber
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:04 PM
> To: Tshon; George Spahl
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: IP RIP default-routing
>
> what are saying is correct however you must use the outgoing interface
> instead of next hop if you want this to work.
> Try it and let us know how it goes.
> Steve
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tshon" <tshon@netzero.net>
> To: "George Spahl" <georges@iglou.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:33 PM
> Subject: Re: IP RIP default-routing
>
>
> > George I am not able to confirm in any other ios, but I have received
> > the same.
> >
> > George Spahl wrote:
> >
> > >Greetings,
> > >
> > >I've long been under the impression that by simply adding a static
> 0/0
> > >route that RIP would automatically include it in outgoing routing
> > >updates, however I'm only able to make that happen by "redistributing
> > >static". (Default information originate works fine also). I've
> reduced
> > >it to a very simple config but get the same results. Also, the
> network
> > >that the 0/0 route points to is in RIP as well (if that makes a
> > >difference. Has the behavior changed for this (or maybe never
> behaved
> > >this way at all)? Version is 12.1. Didn't expect to get hung up on
> IP
> > >RIP...
> > >
> > >George
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:30 GMT-3