From: RSiddappa@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu Feb 21 2002 - 19:26:49 GMT-3
But how is the DLCi asssocited with partular sub-interafce which is
Multi-point.
Use the Intf-dlci command under multi-point subinterafce.
R.
-----Original Message-----
From: Todd Carswell [mailto:acarswell@nc.rr.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 4:21 PM
To: Siddappa, Rajeev; neiby@ureach.com; jim.phillipo@guardent.com;
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Frame map vs intfc DLCI
If you are forbidden from using the frame-relay map statement, you can
overcome the problem in layer 3 by using route maps to set the ip next-hop
address.
Todd Carswell
----- Original Message -----
From: <RSiddappa@NECBNS.com>
To: <neiby@ureach.com>; <jim.phillipo@guardent.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 4:37 PM
Subject: RE: Frame map vs intfc DLCI
> What do u do when they ask in the lab, do not use fram-relay map
statement.
> How ill u configure a DLCi for Multipoint interface. ( Do not need to
worry
> about physical, since DLCI will be assigned directly to the physical
> interface)
>
> My 2 cents..
>
> R.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Neiberger [mailto:neiby@ureach.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:59 AM
> To: jim.phillipo@guardent.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Frame map vs intfc DLCI
>
>
> It's very interesting that you mention this today. I'd never,
> ever, seen anyone use the frame-relay interface-dlci command on
> multipoint interfaces until last night when another list member
> who shall remain nameless (Tim Ouellette) called me about this
> exact issue.
>
> We had a hub router configured with a multipoint subinterface
> using two frame-relay interface-dlci commands instead of frame
> maps. At first I thought this wouldn't work at all but it did,
> somewhat. The command reference says appears to say that it
> ought to work in conjunction with inverse ARP.
>
> However, it didn't seem to be stable and behaved erratically.
> When we removed those two statements and replaced them with two
> frame maps things settled down quite nicely.
>
> Specifically, we were having issues with EIGRP. It seemed to
> work, but the output of show ip eigrp neighbors indicated that
> things might not be working as they ought to be. Sorry, I
> don't have that info available here at work but if Tim reads
> this might be able to post the exact results.
>
> I've always been under the impression that we only used the
> frame-relay interface-dlci command on point-to-point
> subinterfaces so I've always used frame maps in all other cases.
>
> What do you all think about this issue? Is there a time to use
> one or the other on multipoint interfaces? Any gotchas we need
> to look out for?
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:30 GMT-3