From: DAN DORTON (DHSTS68@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 21 2002 - 11:01:54 GMT-3
You are absolutely right...
You ARE NOT supposed to discuss this.
Read the E-Mail again carefully.
>>> "Daniel Prinsloo" <daniel@prove-it.co.uk> 02/20/02 09:14AM >>>
Good day,
I know I am probably not allowed to discuss this, but I have a question
regarding my Lab which I did recently. My scores were quite good, most of
the subjects I was 80% plus up to 100% in some, but on IP/IOS features my
score was 38%. I first thought there was something wrong with the e-proctor,
in that I achieved the goals (everything was working as required), but maybe
not with the exact wording that is required. So, I asked for a re-score. I
just got the reply back that stating that the re-score had the same results.
This concerns me, as all my features, from Voice/DLSW/Routing, etc worked
correctly, but how could IP not work?
How it this then judged? Must we use only the commands that the e-proctor
requires in the format and exact wording before we achieve the correct
marks. Or am just not thinking the "Cisco way".
Thanks for you response in advance.
Daniel
CCSI, CCNA, CCNP, CCDA, CCDP, CCS1
Security Spec, Voice Spec, CCIP, HPOV cert
Checkpoint CCSE, Tivoli Cert, CCNA WAN
CCNP WAN, Network Mgmt Spec, SNA Spec
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of Bla
nk Bkgrd.gif]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:29 GMT-3