Re: Exam re-score question

From: Charles Huang (CharlesNY2000@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 21 2002 - 13:09:13 GMT-3


   
There are many ways to implement a requirement. The CCIE labs won't be so
hard if you can implement them as long as it works. You need to
"understand" every requirements in the question in order to score the
points. For example, if a question ask to make R1, R2 & R3 run OSPF with
simple security. It is actually asking you to implement clear text
authentication on OSPF, so make sure you dont use MD5 for authentication.
If a question ask to run OSPF on R5, I would ask the proctor "what process
ID should I use". In another words, I would ask the proctor if the
questions are not specific. Any requirement with 2 or more possible
implementations, I would ask the proctor "should I implement this
requirement using method A,B or C." The proctor either tell me to use one
of the methods, or he will tell me to re-read the question, which means i
misread or misunderstood the question.

just my 2 cents

----- Original Message -----
From: "DAN DORTON" <DHSTS68@dhs.state.il.us>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; <daniel@prove-it.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: Exam re-score question

> You are absolutely right...
>
> You ARE NOT supposed to discuss this.
>
> Read the E-Mail again carefully.
>
> >>> "Daniel Prinsloo" <daniel@prove-it.co.uk> 02/20/02 09:14AM >>>
> Good day,
>
> I know I am probably not allowed to discuss this, but I have a question
> regarding my Lab which I did recently. My scores were quite good, most of
> the subjects I was 80% plus up to 100% in some, but on IP/IOS features my
> score was 38%. I first thought there was something wrong with the
e-proctor,
> in that I achieved the goals (everything was working as required), but
maybe
> not with the exact wording that is required. So, I asked for a re-score. I
> just got the reply back that stating that the re-score had the same
results.
> This concerns me, as all my features, from Voice/DLSW/Routing, etc worked
> correctly, but how could IP not work?
> How it this then judged? Must we use only the commands that the e-proctor
> requires in the format and exact wording before we achieve the correct
> marks. Or am just not thinking the "Cisco way".
>
> Thanks for you response in advance.
>
>
> Daniel
> CCSI, CCNA, CCNP, CCDA, CCDP, CCS1
> Security Spec, Voice Spec, CCIP, HPOV cert
> Checkpoint CCSE, Tivoli Cert, CCNA WAN
> CCNP WAN, Network Mgmt Spec, SNA Spec
>
> [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name
of Blank Bkgrd.gif]



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:29 GMT-3