From: Larson, Chris (Contractor) (Chris.Larson@xxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 21 2002 - 10:25:33 GMT-3
I do not believe it is part of the test anymore. However, even if it was
there is no need to buy a 2511 in my opinion. Reverse Telnet can be set up
on any router to the Aux port. Moving from reverse telnet to the auxport to
reverse telnet to many lines is not a matter of additional command syntax.
It is the same commands over and over with different arguments for TCP port
number and name and that is about it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Henry Chou [mailto:henchou@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 4:49 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: 2511- or similar ?
Could someone confirm that reverse telnet is not part of the test, so I can
save the money and spend it where needed, such as memory upgrades etc.
Thanks much!
From: "Jeff Kesemeyer" <jkesemey@bellsouth.net>
Subject: RE: 2511- or similar ?
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 16:26:14 -0500
Check for a CS 500 version, it is a cisco terminal server that is much
cheaper,
Here is one for $100:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2004126609
HTH,
Jeff Kesemeyer
CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, CNE
www.bradshawlabs.com
"Your CCIE Rack Rental Source"
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Hansang Bae
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 3:25 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: 2511- or similar ?
On 09:42 AM 2/20/2002 +0100, Luis Miguel Gil wrote:
>Hi all,
>Is there any cheaper device that I could buy to act as a 2511 ? I am
>run out of budget and I would like to buy a 2511 or a similar one. If
>you have one or you know a good substitute, please email me. Thanks !
Others mentioned Lantronix and the like, but Xyplex is another valid
option.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:29 GMT-3