From: Hansang Bae (hbae@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Feb 20 2002 - 18:00:51 GMT-3
At 03:14 PM 2/20/2002 +0000, Daniel Prinsloo wrote:
>I know I am probably not allowed to discuss this, but I have a question
>regarding my Lab which I did recently. My scores were quite good, most of
>the subjects I was 80% plus up to 100% in some, but on IP/IOS features my
>score was 38%. I first thought there was something wrong with the e-proctor,
>in that I achieved the goals (everything was working as required), but maybe
>not with the exact wording that is required. So, I asked for a re-score. I
>just got the reply back that stating that the re-score had the same results.
>This concerns me, as all my features, from Voice/DLSW/Routing, etc worked
>correctly, but how could IP not work?
>How it this then judged? Must we use only the commands that the e-proctor
>requires in the format and exact wording before we achieve the correct
>marks. Or am just not thinking the "Cisco way".
It won't accomplish anything talking to anyone here, I'm sure. Besides, it say
s IP/IOS "Features" not IP connectivity. So perhaps you were missing something
here and there that cost you points?
hsb
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:28 GMT-3