From: Steven Weber (itweber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Feb 20 2002 - 13:54:38 GMT-3
I was under the impression that when they regraded your lad they got a
different "human" proctor to regrade it. Why would it make a difference if
they regraded the same lab with the same automated device. Of course your
score wouldn't change!! I can't say that I'm telling you to do so, but I
would demand that you get a "human" proctor to regrade it and actually look
at your configs to see if they are actually correct. I know that in many
other instances where they can't test your configs like in DLSW+, they
looked to see if it is configured properly and give you credit based on
that. I have hooked up PC's with NETBEUI and have not gotten DLSW+ to work
when friends of mine have gotten it to work using the same config as mine.
Nevertheless it is the config they should be looking at and if you demanded
a regrade then you should have the right to have a real proctor regrade it.
Sorry for the ranting and raving
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Prinsloo" <daniel@prove-it.co.uk>
To: "Ccielab@Groupstudy.Com" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 10:14 AM
Subject: Exam re-score question
> Good day,
>
> I know I am probably not allowed to discuss this, but I have a question
> regarding my Lab which I did recently. My scores were quite good, most of
> the subjects I was 80% plus up to 100% in some, but on IP/IOS features my
> score was 38%. I first thought there was something wrong with the
e-proctor,
> in that I achieved the goals (everything was working as required), but
maybe
> not with the exact wording that is required. So, I asked for a re-score. I
> just got the reply back that stating that the re-score had the same
results.
> This concerns me, as all my features, from Voice/DLSW/Routing, etc worked
> correctly, but how could IP not work?
> How it this then judged? Must we use only the commands that the e-proctor
> requires in the format and exact wording before we achieve the correct
> marks. Or am just not thinking the "Cisco way".
>
> Thanks for you response in advance.
>
>
> Daniel
> CCSI, CCNA, CCNP, CCDA, CCDP, CCS1
> Security Spec, Voice Spec, CCIP, HPOV cert
> Checkpoint CCSE, Tivoli Cert, CCNA WAN
> CCNP WAN, Network Mgmt Spec, SNA Spec
>
> [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name
of Blank Bkgrd.gif]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:28 GMT-3