RE: That Old OSPF-IGRP Problem

From: Zamfir, Mihail (MZ200002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Feb 19 2002 - 10:28:52 GMT-3


   
Hi Carl,
You can create a tunnel between the 2 routers on the same major net with /22
and ... that's it...
It worked for me

Cheers,
Mihail

-----Original Message-----
From: Carl Phelan [mailto:carlphelan@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 19 February 2002 10:53 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: That Old OSPF-IGRP Problem

Hi All,

I have read through the archives and attempted the most viable solution
without success. R4 runs IGRP on /24 mask adjoining R2 which runs IGRP and
OSPF area 0. R2 has e0 as 137.7.8.1/22 - how to get this into IGRP? I
cannot
use area range or summary commands in area 0 so I create a second OSPF
process
- OSPF 2 - and redistribute OSPF proc 1 into OSPF 2 then use the summary
address - 137.7.8.0 255.255.255.0 without joy. If I add a 'red connected
sub'
command to OSPF proc 2 as well then I get a null0 summary to the subnet on
R2
and R4 sees it in IGRP but pings the null0. Any ideas? Thanks. I am
running
IOS 12.0(15).

router ospf 1

 redistribute igrp 10 subnets route-map igrp-redistrib

 network 137.7.8.1 0.0.0.0 area 0

 network 137.7.14.2 0.0.0.0 area 100

!

router ospf 2

 summary-address 137.7.8.0 255.255.255.0

 redistribute ospf 1 subnets

!

router igrp 10

 timers basic 5 15 30 50

 redistribute ospf 1 metric 64000 100 255 1 1500 route-map ospf-redistrib

 redistribute ospf 2 metric 64000 100 255 1 1500 route-map ospf-redistrib

 passive-interface BRI0

 passive-interface Ethernet0

 passive-interface Loopback0

 network 137.7.0.0



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:27 GMT-3