From: joh (j.mittelstaedt@xxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Feb 15 2002 - 11:32:03 GMT-3
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 08:55:38 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Ok, thought I knew BGP some, but now I question myself. Can someone give
>yes/no answers to the following? (Assume whatever in regard to sync, but
>assume that all connections are reachable in each AS via an IGP.)
>
>
>1) An EBGP router receives a route from EBGP peer 'A'. It is connected to
>another EBGP peer 'B'. So it automatically advertises what it receives from
>'A' to the other EBGP peer 'B'?
yes if there is no list
>
>2) An EBGP router receives a route from IBGP peer 'iA'. It is connected to
>EBGP peer 'B'. So it automatically advertises what it receives from 'iA' to
>EBGP peer 'B' even if there were one or more iBGP connections or even if
>some non BGP routers were involved in the transfer?
yes if there is no list
>3) An EBGP router receives a route from IBGP peer 'icA' which is also a
>confederation peer. It is connected to EBGP peer 'B'. So it does not
>advertise what it receives from 'icA' to EBGP peer 'B'?
no...it will be advertised..
>This is what I believe I have seen. But number 3 really has me confused.
>
>TIA
>GW
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:23 GMT-3