From: Lab Candidate (labccie@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Feb 13 2002 - 16:39:46 GMT-3
The question doesn't specify, it's just one of many routes being redis'd
into ospf from eigrp, so I think you just need to filter it
against all statements and make redist decisions based on other attributes.
--- Erich Borchert <erichb80@hotmail.com> wrote:
> You seem to be right, it appears there's a error in his config.
>
> Is the 10.201.100.0 a Eigrp Internal or External learned route ? If you
> know that you won't need to have acl match on both permit staments just
> whatever type of route it falls under internal/external.
>
> HTH
> -Erich
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lab Candidate" <labccie@yahoo.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 11:30 PM
> Subject: Doyle's Redist Question
>
>
> > On Doyle's Volume 1, page 840, Question 4 is asking:
> > redistribute eigrp 1 into ospf 1, need to config:
> > 1. internal eigrp routes as ospf E1 and metric 10
> > 2. external eigrp routes as ospf E2 and metric 50
> > 3. all routes should be redis'd except 10.201.100.0/24
> >
> > so I came up with a route-map to accomplish the task as:
> >
> > router ospf 1
> > network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 16
> > redist eigrp 1 route-map exercise4
> >
> > access-list 1 deny 10.201.100.0
> > access-list 1 permit any
> >
> > route-map exercise4 permit 10
> > match ip address 1
> > match route-type internal
> > set metric 10
> > set metric-type type-1
> >
> > route-map exercise4 permit 20
> > match ip address 1
> > match route-type external
> > set metric 50
> > set metric-type type-2
> >
> > route-map exercise4 permit 30
> > match ip address 1
> >
> > Anyone agree or disagree with me so far?
> >
> > but Doyle's solution is as follows which I disagree:
> >
> > router ospf 1
> > network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 16
> > redist eigrp 1 route-map exercise4
> >
> > access-list 1 deny 10.201.100.0
> > access-list 1 permit any
> >
> > route-map exercise4 permit 10
> > match ip address 1 <== this first permit clause will let all routes
> through except list 1
> > <== and the following 2 route-map clauses will not
> be effective!!
> > route-map exercise4 permit 20
> > match route-type internal
> > set metric 10
> > set metric-type type-1
> >
> > route-map exercise4 permit 30
> > match route-type external
> > set metric 50
> > set metric-type type-2
> >
> > I would like to hear your opinions on this.
> >
> > ----
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:21 GMT-3