From: KK FoK (rgb98a@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Feb 11 2002 - 10:23:53 GMT-3
Just my wild guess - if you're doing this back-to-back between R5 & R6, this
is normal because you don't have the matching ISL settings on R5 & R6. If
you're doing this via a swtich, check the switch vlans.
>From: "Brett Lewis" <blewis@3net-uk.com>
>Reply-To: "Brett Lewis" <blewis@3net-uk.com>
>To: "'sherry huies'" <cholscurry@yahoo.co.kr>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: problem between ISL and RIP,IGRP
>Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:40:57 -0000
>
>Hi,
>
>Could you post the configs?
>
>Cheers
>
>Brett
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>sherry huies
>Sent: 11 February 2002 11:19
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: problem between ISL and RIP,IGRP
>
>Hi all,
>
>I have a problem on catalyst ISL Trunk problem.
>my R5-router's loopback0 is 175.3.5.0/24.
>R5 is connected to R6 via Fastethernet(175.3.56.5/24)
>R6's interface is a Fastethernet 0/0.1(175.3.56.6/24)
>
>between R5 and R6, if i run OSPF or EIGRP,
>R6's routing table is good.
>R6 has the 175.3.5.0 on its routing table.
>
>but, if i run RIP or IGRP between R5 and R6,
>R6 doesn't have the 175.3.5.0 on its routing table.
>
>of course, R6 has the 175.3.5.0 in a short time.
>but after a while, 175.3.5.0 is possibly down
>and disappeared on R6 routing table.
>
>so when i try to debug on R5 and R6,
>R5 continue to send the 175.3.5.0 to R6,
>but, on R6, the receiving debug message dose not show.
>
>
>If i change the ISL FastEthernet to main FastEthernet
>all routing protocol(including RIP,IGRP) is good.
>
>is there any problem between ISL and RIP,IGRP?
>Any suggestions on what I am doing wrong?
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:18 GMT-3