From: Todd Carswell (acarswell@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Feb 10 2002 - 19:09:23 GMT-3
By the way, shouldn't your access list start with a "permit" statement
instead of a deny?
Here's your access list for reference...
> access-list 1000 deny FFFFFFFF 0 r5_fs
> access-list 1000 permit FFFFFFFF 0
----- Original Message -----
From: "yuen me" <yuen_me@hotmail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 1:09 AM
Subject: SAP filter at NLSP redistribution point
> R3 is receiving sap update from NLSP. I try to filter out the SAP at r3
> where NLSP is redistributed into eigrp so that all eigrp routers should
not
> see the sap. I cannot do it with the following command: Why ?
>
> ipx router nlsp
> area-address 600 FFFFFF00
> redistribute eigrp 123
>
> ipx router eigrp 123
> redistribute nlsp
> distribute-sap-list 1000 out nlsp
> network 123
>
> access-list 1000 deny FFFFFFFF 0 r5_fs
> access-list 1000 permit FFFFFFFF 0
>
> r3#sh ipx server
> Codes: S - Static, P - Periodic, E - EIGRP, N - NLSP, H - Holddown, + =
> detail
> U - Per-user static
> 1 Total IPX Servers
>
> Table ordering is based on routing and server info
>
> Type Name Net Address Port Route Hops
> Itf
> N 4 r5_fs 555.0051.0051.0051:0451 2/01 2
> Tu0
>
> Of course, if I change to "distribute-sap-list 1000 out s0" then it works.
> Your insight is appreciated.
>
> Yuenme
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:18 GMT-3