From: ssowell@xxxxxxxx
Date: Fri Feb 08 2002 - 16:42:29 GMT-3
YOu are correct, sir!
Steven Sowell
CCIE#7317
Original Message:
-----------------
From: Chua, Parry Parry.Chua@compaq.com
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 16:07:22 +0800
To: cholscurry@yahoo.co.kr, ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: about OSPF summarization
I think the correct behaviour is that only the ABR should do the area x
range command.( any area)
Parry Chua
-----Original Message-----
From: sherry huies [mailto:cholscurry@yahoo.co.kr]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 3:36 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: about OSPF summarization
Hi all,
in ccie real lab, what's the cisco IOS version?
I have a problem on IOS about OSPF summarization.
my OSPF is redistributed to IGRP(r4) domain.
between ospf and igrp, the network mask is /24.
so i need to summarization mask's/29 to /24.
but i have some ios problem.
on ios 12.1.9 the internal summarization is good.
but on ios 12.1.5
the router is not make the summarization route.
======================================================
IOS 12.1.9
r3#sh run
interface Ethernet0/0
ip address 140.3.34.1 255.255.255.248
interface Ethernet0/1
ip address 140.3.5.1 255.255.255.0
router ospf 1
redistribute igrp 10
network 140.3.34.0 0.0.0.7 area 1
area 1 range 140.3.34.0 255.255.255.0
router igrp 10
redistribute ospf 1
network 140.3.0.0
r3#sh ip route
O 140.3.34.0/24 is a summary, 00:02:03, Null0
C 140.3.34.0/29 is directly
connected,Ethernet0/0
C 140.3.5.0/24 is directly connected,
Ethernet0/1
r4#sh ip route
C 140.4.5.0/24 is directly connected,
Ethernet0/1
I 140.3.34.0/24 [100/610] via 140.3.5.4,
00:00:20, Ethernet0/0
======================================================
on IOS 12.1.5
r3#sh run
router ospf 1
network 140.3.34.0 0.0.0.7 area 1
area 1 range 140.3.34.0 255.255.255.0
router igrp 10
redistribute ospf 1
network 140.3.0.0
r3#sh ip route
C 140.3.34.0/29 is directly
connected,Ethernet0/0
C 140.3.5.0/24 is directly connected,
Ethernet0/1
r4#sh ip route
C 140.4.5.0/24 is directly connected,
Ethernet0/1
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:16 GMT-3