From: Steven.Dill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri Feb 08 2002 - 12:52:25 GMT-3
What is this!!!!
October release!
The file iso\cc\iso1946.htm is in: cc
Please click here , then swap your CD.
thanks again,
Sd
-----Original Message-----
From: Lupi, Guy [mailto:Guy.Lupi@eurekaggn.com]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:09 AM
To: 'DAN DORTON'; jbanner@cisco.com; rodrigo.silva@cpm.com.br;
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: solie skinet lab - and the old topic ospf-igrp
But what other way would you do it if you were told that the routes had to
appear in Router B's table? I know it would be much easier to get a default
route in there if it was allowed, but what if it wasn't?
~-----Original Message-----
~From: DAN DORTON [mailto:DHSTS68@dhs.state.il.us]
~Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:07 AM
~To: jbanner@cisco.com; rodrigo.silva@cpm.com.br; Lupi, Guy;
~ccielab@groupstudy.com
~Subject: RE: solie skinet lab - and the old topic ospf-igrp
~
~
~The question is... Why bother going through so much trouble to get the
~routes there that way? ;-)
~
~>>> "Lupi, Guy" <Guy.Lupi@eurekaggn.com> 02/07/02 06:52PM >>>
~Ok, I see that this works, but I am having trouble understanding why.
~Could
~someone explain this to me with a little detail. Lets say I have the
~following:
~
~ OSPF Area 0
~ 165.10.11.0/25
~ |
~ |
~ RouterA------IGRP 165.10.26.0/24-------RouterB
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ OSPF Area 0
~ 165.10.7.0/24
~ |
~ | OSPF Area 0
~ RouterC--------165.10.185.0/26
~
~
~All interfaces are in OSPF area 0 except for the one to Router B, so
~Router
~A gets the routes for everything, Router B is restricted to /24's
~within the
~165.10.0.0 network. I can do a summary address 165.10.11.0/24 under
~the
~original OSPF process and Router B gets it, but it will not get
~165.10.185.0/24 until I do a second routing process, like OSPF 10,
~redistribute the original process into this one, do a summary address
~for
~165.10.185.0/24 in the second process, and redistribute both processes
~into
~IGRP. I am having trouble understanding why, if both the 165.10.11.0
~and
~165.10.185.0 are OSPF internal routes, what is the difference, why
~does
~redistributing into the other process work? Sorry for the long email,
~but I
~really want to understand this.
~
~
~~-----Original Message-----
~~From: S. John Banner [mailto:jbanner@cisco.com]
~~Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 6:08 PM
~~To: Rodrigo Espinha T Da Silva; ccielab@groupstudy.com
~~Subject: RE: solie skinet lab - and the old topic ospf-igrp
~~
~~
~~ To get this to work (I did it yesterday), redistribute all
~~OSPF routes
~~into the second OSPF process, which makes them all External
~~routes, and as
~~such not redistributable (the original OSPF routes are
~redistributable
~~because they are internal and thus prefered over the external
~~routes and
~~thus appear in the routing table). Then use "summary-address"
~~to summarize
~~in the second OSPF process. These summarized routes show up
~~in the routing
~~table (because that is the only place they appear) and are thus
~~redistributable. Finally, redistribute *BOTH* OSPF processes
~~into IGRP (and
~~make sure that IGRP has a higher admin distance than OSPF or
~~everything will
~~break).
~~ Also, make sure that you don't redistribute the summaries
~~back into OSPF
~~as that will cause nasty problems...
~~
~~ sjb.
~~
~~> -----Original Message-----
~~> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On
~~Behalf Of
~~> Rodrigo Espinha T Da Silva
~~> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:29 AM
~~> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
~~> Subject: solie skinet lab - and the old topic ospf-igrp
~~>
~~>
~~> Hi Guys,
~~>
~~> I did the skynet and still have the problem with redistribution
~~> between ospf
~~> and igrp :
~~>
~~> regardind the mask /28 ospf to /24 igrp , the solution
~~discussed in email
~~> before ( 25/jan untilll 29/jan ) regarding create another
~~ospf process and
~~> use the summary adrress comand works perfect, I tried to
~~create in the R3
~~> router and ABR configuring the loopback in another area , works
~~> for the ospf
~~> database , i can see an summarized network geneated for the
~~area 0 range
~~> command in R1 , but does'nt solve the redistr problem ( help ).
~~>
~~>
~~> I can't find a solution for /28 ospf to /24 igrp ( reverse
~~> summarization ),
~~> someone can send me an numeric example.
~~> help!
~~>
~~> challenge day : 27/fev
~~>
~~> thanks in advance
~~>
~~> Rodrigo E. Teixeira da Silva
~~>
~~>
~~> Rodrigo E. Teixeira da Silva
~~> CPM Comunicacoes
~~> Analista de Suporte Tecnico
~~> CCNP Lan & Wan Certified.
~~> Phone: + 55-11-4196-0793
~~> Fax: + 55-11-4196-0900
~~> Call Dispach: 0800-117239
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:15 GMT-3