RE: Multilink interface vs. Virtual Templates

From: Donahue, Gary (GDonahue@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Feb 05 2002 - 22:07:46 GMT-3

• Next message: Peter van Oene: "Re: Undocumented iBGP Behavior (Confirmed by Cisco)"
• Previous message: W. Alan Robertson: "Re: Undocumented iBGP Behavior (Confirmed by Cisco)"
• Maybe in reply to: Donahue, Gary: "Multilink interface vs. Virtual Templates"
• Next in thread: Donahue, Gary: "RE: Multilink interface vs. Virtual Templates"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Bond two T1s. I can create a virtual template, or on newer code I can create
a multilink interface.

GAD

-----Original Message-----
From: MADMAN [mailto:dmadlan@qwest.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 10:18 AM
To: Donahue, Gary
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Multilink interface vs. Virtual Templates

  What are you trying to do?? you can multilink on a virtual template,
the two are not the same.

  Dave

"Donahue, Gary" wrote:
>
> What's the difference, and what's the benefit of one over the other?
>
> I've used and seen both, and assumed the Multilink method was newer and
> prefered, but I can't find any info on this.
>
> Thanks,
>
> GAD

• Next message: Peter van Oene: "Re: Undocumented iBGP Behavior (Confirmed by Cisco)"
• Previous message: W. Alan Robertson: "Re: Undocumented iBGP Behavior (Confirmed by Cisco)"
• Maybe in reply to: Donahue, Gary: "Multilink interface vs. Virtual Templates"
• Next in thread: Donahue, Gary: "RE: Multilink interface vs. Virtual Templates"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:12 GMT-3