Re: Re: Junos BGP routes update

From: John Neiberger (neiby@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Feb 04 2002 - 14:14:44 GMT-3

Next message: Tom Holloway: "RE: FXS port and Mod Tap"
Previous message: Babacar Diop: "2 NM-4E for 2NM-2V+2VIC-2FXS"
Maybe in reply to: Mark Lewis: "Re: Junos BGP routes update"
Next in thread: Mark Lewis: "Re: Re: Junos BGP routes update"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Interesting! I hadn't noticed this before and I assumed that
Cisco behaved in the same way that Juniper does. I didn't
realize that with Cisco, the advertising router checks the AS-
PATH before sending an update.

I think that falls into the category of stuff that is Good To
Know (tm).

Thanks,
John

Next message: Tom Holloway: "RE: FXS port and Mod Tap"
Previous message: Babacar Diop: "2 NM-4E for 2NM-2V+2VIC-2FXS"
Maybe in reply to: Mark Lewis: "Re: Junos BGP routes update"
Next in thread: Mark Lewis: "Re: Re: Junos BGP routes update"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:11 GMT-3