From: Chua, Parry (Parry.Chua@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Feb 04 2002 - 03:37:28 GMT-3
I guess this what Jeff try to said....Cruncher is the asbr, the route
172.16.190.0/24 was
orginate from rip and will be in Cruncher routing table and AD of
120(rip). In case this
route was inject via OSPF back to Cruncher again, it will have a AD of
110(ospf) and will be
better then RIP, the question here is, this route was orginate from RIP,
we don't want to
become a ospf route unless the RIP route is down...
Parry Chua
-----Original Message-----
From: michael robertson [mailto:michael_w_2ca@yahoo.ca]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:04 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: route filtering question
Hi, Group,
I have a question here about route filtering.
In Jeff's book ( VOLUME 1) page 780, he mentions that
172.16.190.0/24 IS restributed from rip to OSPF and
then advertise back to router Cruncher, the route will
be treated as route learned by OSPF, I have done this
scenario, and I follow exactly what he says, But I
don't see that the route is marked as OSPF learned
routes. it's RIP learned route.
I think that the redistribution router Cruncher is
smart enough to know that the router is redistributed
from RIP to OSPF.
Can any person here explain me what happens in the
book and why I don't get the result.
Regards
michael
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:11 GMT-3