From: joh (jokel@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jan 14 2002 - 11:05:07 GMT-3
hi,
i4m new in town - but this i know.
ok - if we do a nssa with the no-summary statement, we4re all fine.
but when we do it without the no-summary , ASBR doesn4t implement
with the LSA-Type 3 the default - route- because this is for the
Inter-Area Information.
For this we need, as peter van Oene said before the command
area 1 nssa default-information-originate
with that you don4t need any default-network entry or whatever you
tried to workarround.
ADD-Onn :
when you do the above configuration - you4d see in the nssa area as well
all the EIGRP Networks and a default - route. To surpress this behavior
as well - do the following.
area 1 nssa no-redistribution default-information-originate
then you have just your default-route to the area 0 in your nssa-area
see you
joh
"Jeremy Laurenson (Cisco)" wrote:
> No, its not considered a static route unless you don't do it
> clasfully - in which case you'll see IOS add a static route in the config.
>
> Default-net doesnt create a route, it simply "elects" a route as eligible,
> if
> it exists.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Troy Rader
> Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 6:16 PM
> To: Denise Donohue
> Cc: 'Albert Lu'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: OSPF NSSA default route question
>
> Denise,
>
> Good to know. I was working with an ABR and not an ASBR, for my specific
> lab. I need to work with the ASBR to see that too.
>
> Thanks,
> Troy
>
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Denise Donohue wrote:
>
> > From the link that Peter sent:
> >
> > NSSA ASBR can generate a default only when it has a default route in its
> > routing table.
> >
> > NSSA ABR can generate a default route with or without a default route in
> its
> > own routing table.
> >
> > I ran into this issue today. I had a router with an EIGRP interface, an
> > OSPF area 0 interface, and a couple of interfaces in a NSSA (regular NSSA,
> > not 'no-summary'). That router wouldn't send a default route into the
> NSSA
> > area until I put in a 'default network' command. BTW, is a default
> network
> > considered a static route???
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > Troy Rader
> > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 7:26 PM
> > To: Albert Lu
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: OSPF NSSA default route question
> >
> >
> > No, you do not need a static default route for OSPF to inject the default
> > route to the other routers when using 'no-summary' with NSSA, which I've
> > seen being described as an "NSSA Totally stub area".
> >
> > I would not answer so confidently if I didn't have this setup in my lab
> > right now, and double checked it twice before replying. :)
> >
> > If anyone believes otherwise, please correct me. Thanks.
> >
> > Troy
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Albert Lu wrote:
> >
> > > Do you need a static default route for OSPF to inject the default route
> to
> > > the other routers?
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Troy Rader [mailto:troy@onenet.net]
> > > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:07 AM
> > > To: Albert Lu
> > > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com; 'Peter van Oene'
> > > Subject: RE: OSPF NSSA default route question
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes it does. Using 'no-summary' removes inter-area routes. Using
> > > 'def-info-orig' does not remove inter-area routes. Both methods do
> inject
> > > a default route.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the great replies. This is an area I struggled with, and now
> > > looking back, don't see why it was so difficult. :)
> > >
> > > Troy
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Albert Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > > Wouldn't using
> > > >
> > > > area 1 nssa no-summary
> > > >
> > > > also inject a default route?
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > > > Peter van Oene
> > > > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:40 AM
> > > > To: Troy Rader; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > Subject: Re: OSPF NSSA default route question
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > In additional, hitting cisco.com and entering nssa default information
> > > > brings up this as the first hit.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/nssa.html#3
> > > >
> > > > This is a pretty decent page describing some NSSA config
> > > > elements. Although the Cisco search engine is not the best thing in
> the
> > > > world, it definitely doesn't hurt to try it.
> > > >
> > > > pete
> > > >
> > > > ps, since I unicast my first post, the answer is adding area 1 nssa
> > > > default-information-originate on R2, the NSSA ABR.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > At 03:27 PM 1/13/2002 -0600, Troy Rader wrote:
> > > > >I've searched the archives and I'm not finding an answer that clears
> > this
> > > > >issue up for me.
> > > > >
> > > > >Here's my diagram: (I guess proportional font matters here)
> > > > >
> > > > >R10---R8---R3---R6---R2---R9---R11---R14---R4
> > > > > |
> > > > > |
> > > > > R5
> > > > >
> > > > >R10-R8 is RIP
> > > > >R8-R3-R6 is Area 2
> > > > >R6-R2 is Area 0
> > > > >R6-R5 is Area 3
> > > > >R2-R9-R11 is Area 1
> > > > >R11-R14 is IGRP
> > > > >R14-R4 is RIP
> > > > >
> > > > >Area 3 was the stub and then totally stubby area. I did okay with
> > that.
> > > > >
> > > > >Area 1 is where I have my NSSA. I understand that my external routes
> > > from
> > > > >R10 are not learned in the NSSA, and that the redist'd routes from
> R11
> > > and
> > > > >IGRP are N1 or N2 OSPF NSSA Ext and are propogated throughout OSPF.
> > > > >However, I'm lost on how to allow R9 and R11 to get to R10 RIP
> networks
> > > > >since they are External and not visible in the NSSA. I tried to
> > > originate
> > > > >a default from R2. R6 ended up with a default, but R9 did not.
> > > > >
> > > > >What's the trick, solution, answer?
> > > > >
> > > > >TIA,
> > > > >Troy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:27 GMT-3