From: Stephen C. Feldberg (scfeldberg@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jan 10 2002 - 19:19:17 GMT-3
Jim,
This may be splitting hairs, but I would consider frame-relay interface-dlci
XXX a protocol mapping.
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Brown" <Jim.Brown@CaseLogic.com>
To: "'vadim shayevich'" <vshayevich@hotmail.com>; "'CCIE Groupstudy'"
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 4:08 PM
Subject: RE: CCIE Pract. Studies book: Transp Bridging
> There is no protocol mapping on a point-to-point interface other than
layer
> 3 addressing. A point-to-point will put anything on the wire that is
> directed to it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vadim shayevich [mailto:vshayevich@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:27 PM
> To: CCIE Groupstudy
> Subject: CCIE Pract. Studies book: Transp Bridging
>
>
> On page 853 transparent bridging over frame-relay scenario:
>
>
> [r enterprise]<s0.2 point-to-point> -- (dlci102 - dlci121 ) -- <s0>[r
> shuttle_5]
> [r enterprise]<s0.1 multipoint > -- (dlci130 - dlci131 ) -- <s0>[r
> shuttle_6]
>
> If you look in the final configuration there is no [frame-relay map bridge
> <dlci> broadcast] statement specified on either side of point-to-point
> connection.
>
> enterprise#
> bridge 1 protocol ieee
> int serial0.2 point-to-point
> ip address 172.16.2.1 255.255.255.0
> no ip directed-broadcast
> frame-relay interface-dlci 102
> bridge-group 1
>
> shuttle_5#
> bridge 1 protocol ieee
> int serial0
> ip address 172.16.2.5 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> frame-relay interface-dlci 121
> frame-relay lmi-type cisco
> bridge-group 1
>
> Will STP work?
>
>
> ABNAMRO NA
> vadim.shayevich@abnamro.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:23 GMT-3