From: Bhisham Bajaj (bhishambajaj@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jan 08 2002 - 16:55:55 GMT-3
Ajith
Thank you man
I worked on it for some time to understand this But
was not able to
But it just toke me 30 seconds to red your mail and I
got the thing
Thank u
Reg
bhisham
--- "Abraham, Ajith" <Ajith.Abraham@FLHOSP.ORG> wrote:
> Your network of 172.1.88.0 255.255.224.0 will
> attempt to include the
> 172.1.89.0 network too (subnet 172.1.64.0, host from
> 172.1.64.1, Host to
> 172.1.95.254 with broadcast address 172.1.95.255),
> which happens to be
> alread configured for the first interface.
>
> AA
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bhisham Bajaj [mailto:bhishambajaj@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:02 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Ip address overlaps with VLSM
>
>
> I am trying to give a ip add to two different
> interface with different mask
>
> S0
> R1(config-if)#ip address 172.1.89.1 255.255.225.0
>
> S1
>
> R1(config-if)#ip address 172.1.88.1 255.255.224.0
>
> ******* 172.1.64.0 overlaps with Serial0
> ********
>
> ( ****** the output that I get as u put in the
> command
> ********)
>
> now I know the network address is 64 and the network
> first 3 bit are 010
> that is same to the s0 first 3 bit 010
>
> I try it wth all the address that have the first 3
> bit different and it works
>
> S1
>
> R1(config-if)#ip address 172.1.96.1 255.255.224.0
>
> And it works the first 3 bit = 011
>
> Know some how I am not able to understand why is it
> doing so when I am using different mask
>
> The network address is also no all 0000000 so it
> cannot be the ip subnet-zero thing
>
> But there is some thing got to do with the same
> network bits with a different mask
>
>
> What is it can some one help me on this
>
> I am spending a lot of time on things like this
> would it pay back ?
>
>
>
> Thank u
>
> Bhisham
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:20 GMT-3