From: Richard Geiger (geiger_rich@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jan 08 2002 - 05:33:37 GMT-3
I would expect on that you will not be allowed to create additional routing
processes, and summerization is not the answer in the newer O/S.
The end game comes down to route-maps, that is if your objective is ping
from every interface to every interface (remember your local policy as
well).
If you are looking at injecting routes a default network to a network
already in your routing table works good. Like your loopback. Any injection
of a Null route through summerization would probably kill you because it
actually puts a summerized static route to null.
-Rich
>From: "Stephen C. Feldberg" <scfeldberg@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: "Stephen C. Feldberg" <scfeldberg@hotmail.com>
>To: "Yu Kay" <kaykkyu@yahoo.com>, "omar guarisco"
><oguarisco44@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: redistribution ospf and igrp
>Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 21:06:24 -0500
>
>Yes, I see that now from your original post. How about creating another
>OSPF process, summarize the /28 into /24 during redistribution into the
>second process using summary-address, then redistribute the route with the
>correct length mask from the second OSPF process into IGRP.
>
>Steve
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Yu Kay" <kaykkyu@yahoo.com>
>To: "Stephen C. Feldberg" <scfeldberg@hotmail.com>; "omar guarisco"
><oguarisco44@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:44 PM
>Subject: Re: redistribution ospf and igrp
>
>
> > Stephen,
> >
> > As I write, the router is a ASBR and cannot be a ABR,
> > it cannot use commnad "area-range"
> >
> > keith
> > --- "Stephen C. Feldberg" <scfeldberg@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > My mind was thinking summarization- I typed
> > > summary-address when I meant
> > > area-range.
> > >
> > > Steve
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "omar guarisco" <oguarisco44@hotmail.com>
> > > To: <scfeldberg@hotmail.com>; <kaykkyu@yahoo.com>;
> > > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:44 PM
> > > Subject: Re: redistribution ospf and igrp
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > For OSPF, this command summarizes only routes from
> > > other routing protocols
> > > that are being redistributed into OSPF a single
> > > aggregate entry of LSA type
> > > 5
> > > >
> > > > How can you summarize OSPF that is /28 to a /24
> > > with summary address ???
> > > >
> > > > omar
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >From: "Stephen C. Feldberg"
> > > <scfeldberg@hotmail.com>
> > > > >Reply-To: "Stephen C. Feldberg"
> > > <scfeldberg@hotmail.com>
> > > > >To: "Yu Kay" <kaykkyu@yahoo.com>,
> > > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > >Subject: Re: redistribution ospf and igrp
> > > > >Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:55:22 -0500
> > > > >
> > > > >Use the OSPF summary address command to summarize
> > > the OSPF /28 as a /24
> > > on
> > > > >the ASBR. The /24 will then redistribute
> > > properly into IGRP.
> > > > >
> > > > >Steve
> > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > >From: "Yu Kay" <kaykkyu@yahoo.com>
> > > > >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > >Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:14 AM
> > > > >Subject: redistribution ospf and igrp
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have a question that if the router (ospf and
> > > igrp
> > > > > > running and different snbnet mask, ospf 28 bit
> > > and
> > > > > > igrp 24 bit sunbet mask) only can be ASBR (it
> > > is
> > > > > > connected at area 1 and IGRP domain, so it
> > > cannot add
> > > > > > a dummy loopback to become ABR), how can
> > > > > > redistributed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > keith
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:20 GMT-3