From: Jay Hennigan (jay@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jan 07 2002 - 17:01:20 GMT-3
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, kurt kruegel wrote:
> that application doesn't really make sense to me ?
> your house is not copyrighted material or someone else's intellectual propert
y.
> to me lab equipment (routers,switches) would be physical property
> (like your house)
> but, (labs)
> would be copyrighted material
> composed of someone else's intellectual property that you are granted a licen
ce to
>
> use.
But routers and switches contain intellectual property in the form of IOS
and ROM code. CDs, tapes, books and magazines all contain intellectual
property. All of the above can be bought and sold.
I can see the bootcamp folks going after someone making Xeroxes of thir
labs, and with good reason. But resale of the physical document that has
been bought and paid for? Sounds fishy to me.
-- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Administration - jay@west.net NetLojix Communications, Inc. - http://www.netlojix.com/ WestNet: Connecting you to the planet. 805 884-6323
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:19 GMT-3