From: Michael Popovich (m.popovich@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jan 04 2002 - 11:02:41 GMT-3
I was under the impression by Doyle's book that CLNS routing had to be on
for IP routing to take place.
On page 600-601 Doyle states that even if TCP/IP is the only protocol being
routed, due to IS-IS being a CLNP protocol the packets that it uses to
communicate with peers are CLNS PDU's and that forces the IS-IS router to
have an ISO address.
I took that to mean the clns routing had to be on. I may have misinterpreted
and I certainly haven't tried IS-IS in my lab without it on. I will be doing
that today.
Thanks,
Michael Popovich
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter van Oene" <pvo@usermail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 7:43 AM
Subject: Re: CLNS routing
> Forgot your last question. You can leave CLNS routing off in all
> cases. Your router will route IP in ISIS quite well without it.
>
> Pete
>
>
> At 08:16 PM 1/3/2002 -0800, you wrote:
> >I'm confused about the difference between the
> >Inegrated ISIS routing and the Multi-area ISIS
> >routing?
> >and their relations with enabling the CLNS routing on
> >the router?
> >Could anyone give some explanations?
> > TIA
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:15 GMT-3