From: VZ (vincentzhang@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Dec 31 2001 - 07:05:04 GMT-3
Kivas,
NO, I really find the difference in treatment of internal and external
OSPF routes in lab environment.
Would you check it?
V
Waters, Kivas (UK72) wrote:
>Hi Vincent, your understanding of the below issue is not 100%. Any OSPF
>routes which are subnetted, internal or external, will not be redistributed
>into a classful IGRP network. The issue here is a classful subnet mask
>issue, OSPF internal routes are not treated any differently to OSPf external
>routes when it comes to redistribution into RIPv1 or IGRP.
>
>1. Is it right result? No.
>
>best regards
>
>Ki
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: VZ [mailto:vincentzhang@yahoo.com]
>Sent: 31 December 2001 03:21
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: various OSPF routes redis into IGRP
>
>
> Hello All,
>
>Considering the situation that a router performs OSPF/IGRP redistribution.
>
>all OSPF internal routes will be redistributed into IGRP even if
>classful/supernet/subnet mask routes they are.
>
>all OSPF external with classful mask will be redistributed too.
>
>But all OSPF external with supernet/subnet mask will NOT be redistributed.
>
>My questions,
>
>1. Is it right result?
>2. IS the same result for ospf -> RIP/EIGRP or not?
>
>thanks, V
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:50 GMT-3