From: Waters, Kivas (UK72) (Kivas.Waters@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Dec 29 2001 - 09:47:20 GMT-3
Hello Kevin, as you know, the "ip route-cache" interface statement is used
to configure per destination load sharing for IP traffic. The IPX
equivalent "ipx route-cache" does not however, enable the same load sharing
feature for IPX traffic. "ipx route-cache" enables only fast switching of
IPX packets. "ipx per-host-load share" is required to enable per
destination load sharing for IPX traffic over equal cost routes.
regards
Ki
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin [mailto:kevin@btamail.net.cn]
Sent: 29 December 2001 00:00
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: IPX per-host load balance and ipx route-cache puzzled
Hello all, what's difference between "ipx per-host-load share" and "ipx
route-cache",
I think they can get the result.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:49 GMT-3