From: Joseph Ezerski (jezerski@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Dec 20 2001 - 21:22:36 GMT-3
I beleive if you re-read those pages you will see that EIGRP is not using a
passive interface on the serial link. It is IGRP that is passive. That
part of the book is explaining the auto-redistribution between IGRP and
EIGRP. So, Earhart establishes EIGRP neighbors with Lindbergh and Cochran.
He then redistibutes those routes in his IGRP update to Curtiss.
-Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeongwoo Park [mailto:Jpark@wams.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 4:11 PM
To: 'jezerski@broadcom.com'
Subject: RE: Eigrp neighbor discovery?
According to Doly's book P.379 it seems to say that they can talk to each
other. Moreover, P. 381 routing table obviously has a route to get to the
other router.
I wonder what I have missed.
JP
-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Ezerski [mailto:jezerski@broadcom.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 4:06 PM
To: 'Jeongwoo Park'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Eigrp neighbor discovery?
Is there any sort of manual neighbor statement in the EIGRP protocol? If
there were, EIGRP would unicast and form a neighbor relationship.
-Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Jeongwoo Park
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 3:43 PM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: Eigrp neighbor discovery?
Hi all
Came across a confusion while I read Doly'e book.
There are two routers both running eigrp.
R1(s0)----------------passive interface(s1)R2
If I put passive interface on serial 1 interface of R2, how can they
discover its neighbor and talk to each other?
Since R2 is not sending any Hello packet due to passive interface on s1, I
think there is no way they can get to neighbor router.
Am I right? If not, what am I missing?
JP
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:46 GMT-3