From: Jeongwoo Park (Jpark@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Dec 20 2001 - 21:19:41 GMT-3
What confuses me is what Doly's book P.379 says.
It says that passive interface blocks unnecessary traffic.
But P.381 routing table clearly shows that it has the route to get to other
router after passive interface.
I am still confused. ???
Anyway thanks for the reply.
JP
-----Original Message-----
From: Phillip Estrada (EUS) [mailto:Phillip.Estrada@am1.ericsson.se]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 4:12 PM
To: Jeongwoo Park; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: RE: Eigrp neighbor discovery?
I'm not too sure what you're asking but hopefully this should clear it up
for you.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/103/16.html
<http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/103/16.html>
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeongwoo Park [ mailto:Jpark@wams.com <mailto:Jpark@wams.com> ]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 3:43 PM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: Eigrp neighbor discovery?
Hi all
Came across a confusion while I read Doly'e book.
There are two routers both running eigrp.
R1(s0)----------------passive interface(s1)R2
If I put passive interface on serial 1 interface of R2, how can they
discover its neighbor and talk to each other?
Since R2 is not sending any Hello packet due to passive interface on s1, I
think there is no way they can get to neighbor router.
Am I right? If not, what am I missing?
JP
<http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html>
To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
majordomo@groupstudy.com with the body containing:
unsubscribe ccielab
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:46 GMT-3